Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Milling the head for more compression?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Why has no one mentioned a thinner base gasket? That is the cheapest and easiest way to move the piston closer to the head and increase compression. Measure the deck height and valve clearance first, of course. Base gaskets are available as thin as .005 for the 1100e
    sigpic
    09 Kaw C14 Rocket powered Barcalounger
    1983 GS1100e
    82\83 1100e Frankenbike
    1980 GS1260
    Previous 65 Suzuki 80 Scrambler, 76 KZ900, 02 GSF1200S, 81 GS1100e, 80 GS850G

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by bobgroger View Post
      Why has no one mentioned a thinner base gasket? That is the cheapest and easiest way to move the piston closer to the head and increase compression. Measure the deck height and valve clearance first, of course. Base gaskets are available as thin as .005 for the 1100e
      Because the OP is working with an 8 valve GS1000. The different thickness base gaskets are used on the 16 valve motors to set the squish clearance. Not applicable to the 8 valve engines as they don't have a squish band to speak of.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by bobgroger View Post
        Why has no one mentioned a thinner base gasket? That is the cheapest and easiest way to move the piston closer to the head and increase compression. Measure the deck height and valve clearance first, of course. Base gaskets are available as thin as .005 for the 1100e
        when you remove the base gasket you move the piston closer to the head. Which can be very bad if you don’t have the proper piston to head clearance. When you mill the head your not moving the pistons any closer to the head your making the combustion chamber smaller.
        You base gasket thickness is determined by the piston to head clearance nothing else when building a preformance motor.
        compression should only be increased by milling the head or using aftermarket pistons.
        My stable
        84 GSX1100EFG-10.62 @ 125 mph 64'' W/B.
        85 GS1150-9.72@146mph stock W/B.
        88 GSXR1100-dragbike 9.18@139.92mph/5.68@118mph.
        98 Bandit 1200-9.38@146mph/6.02@121mph.
        90 Suzuki GS 1425cc FBG Pro Stock chassis 5.42@124mph
        06 GSXR750 10.44@135mph
        00 Honda elite 80 pit bike

        Comment


          #34
          That just don't sound right. If you remove the base gasket, you don't raise the piston at all, you lower the head toward the piston by lowering the cylinder block that has the head mounted to it, piston is at exact same place. Only way to raise the piston is stroker crankshaft, longer connecting rod, or taller piston. Either way the closer the piston gets to the head, the higher the compression will be. If I'm thinking right !
          1983 GS1100E, 1983 CB1100F, 1991 GSX1100G, 1996 Kaw. ZL600 Eliminator, 1999 Bandit 1200S, 2005 Bandit 1200S, 2000 Kaw. ZRX 1100

          Comment


            #35
            "Raise the piston" (by removing the base gasket) or "lower the head" (by milling it), you are reducing the combustion volume.

            As he mentioned, though, milling the head only shrinks the volume of the combustion chamber, it does not reduce the piston-to-head clearance.

            .
            sigpic
            mine: 2000 Honda GoldWing GL1500SE and 1980 GS850G'K' "Junior"
            hers: 1982 GS850GL - "Angel" and 1969 Suzuki T250 Scrambler
            #1 son: 1986 Yamaha Venture Royale 1300 and 1982 GS650GL "Rat Bagger"
            #2 son: 1980 GS1000G
            Family Portrait
            Siblings and Spouses
            Mom's first ride
            Want a copy of my valve adjust spreadsheet for your 2-valve per cylinder engine? Send me an e-mail request (not a PM)
            (Click on my username in the upper-left corner for e-mail info.)

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Steve View Post
              "Raise the piston" (by removing the base gasket) or "lower the head" (by milling it), you are reducing the combustion volume.

              As he mentioned, though, milling the head only shrinks the volume of the combustion chamber, it does not reduce the piston-to-head clearance.

              .
              Good luck with that theory.
              '82 GS450T

              Comment


                #37
                Now I see, base gasket reduces deck height. Milling the head does not. Milling the head still does reduce the piston to valve clearance.
                1983 GS1100E, 1983 CB1100F, 1991 GSX1100G, 1996 Kaw. ZL600 Eliminator, 1999 Bandit 1200S, 2005 Bandit 1200S, 2000 Kaw. ZRX 1100

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by rphillips View Post
                  That just don't sound right. If you remove the base gasket, you don't raise the piston at all, you lower the head toward the piston by lowering the cylinder block that has the head mounted to it, piston is at exact same place. Only way to raise the piston is stroker crankshaft, longer connecting rod, or taller piston. Either way the closer the piston gets to the head, the higher the compression will be. If I'm thinking right !
                  I am using .010" as a number not that they make an .010" gasket. Imagine if you have a .010" base gasket, and you put the cylinders on. The piston will be at a certain height in relation to the cylinder deck if you measured it. Now if you remove the .010" gasket and reinstall the cylinders, they will go on .010" further down because the gasket isn't there. If you measure the piston height in relation to the deck of the cylinders the piston would be .010" higher in the cylinder with an .010" gasket removed. You are not changing the stroke, just relocating the TDC height of the piston in relation to the cylinder deck height. You are effectively raising the piston in the bore by reducing the base gasket thickness.

                  Originally posted by Steve View Post
                  "Raise the piston" (by removing the base gasket) or "lower the head" (by milling it), you are reducing the combustion volume.

                  As he mentioned, though, milling the head only shrinks the volume of the combustion chamber, it does not reduce the piston-to-head clearance.

                  .
                  Milling the head or using a thinner base or head gasket will reduce the combustion volume by; reducing the piston to head clearance by the amount of metal removed from the head, or by the thickness removed from the base or head gasket. Removing thickness of the base gasket places the piston slightly higher in the bore by the amount removed from the base gasket, thus reducing the piston to cylinder head clearance at TDC. Milling the head or using a thinner head gasket places the roof of the combustion chamber closer to the piston by the amount shaved from the head, or by any reduction of thickness removed from the head gasket thus reducing the piston to cylinder head clearance at TDC. Any of these mods alter cam timing but not a great deal.
                  Last edited by metalfab; 10-12-2020, 08:41 AM.
                  1981 GS1100E
                  1982 GS1100E



                  "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." Aristotle

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by rphillips View Post
                    Now I see, base gasket reduces deck height. Milling the head does not. Milling the head still does reduce the piston to valve clearance.
                    unless you recut the valve deeper in the seats also.
                    I have a 1150 head with .105” milled off and the valves cut .040” deeper in the seats. This is on a street bike.
                    Last edited by stetracer; 10-12-2020, 06:57 PM.
                    My stable
                    84 GSX1100EFG-10.62 @ 125 mph 64'' W/B.
                    85 GS1150-9.72@146mph stock W/B.
                    88 GSXR1100-dragbike 9.18@139.92mph/5.68@118mph.
                    98 Bandit 1200-9.38@146mph/6.02@121mph.
                    90 Suzuki GS 1425cc FBG Pro Stock chassis 5.42@124mph
                    06 GSXR750 10.44@135mph
                    00 Honda elite 80 pit bike

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Alway make sure you have the proper clearances no matter how you build it.
                      My stable
                      84 GSX1100EFG-10.62 @ 125 mph 64'' W/B.
                      85 GS1150-9.72@146mph stock W/B.
                      88 GSXR1100-dragbike 9.18@139.92mph/5.68@118mph.
                      98 Bandit 1200-9.38@146mph/6.02@121mph.
                      90 Suzuki GS 1425cc FBG Pro Stock chassis 5.42@124mph
                      06 GSXR750 10.44@135mph
                      00 Honda elite 80 pit bike

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by stetracer View Post
                        unless you recut the valve deeper in the seats also.
                        I have a 1150 head with .105” milled off and the valves cut .040” deeper in the seats. This is on a street bike.
                        Seating the valves deeper does increase the valve to piston clearance. But what is important with seating the valve deeper into the head, whatever dimension you seat the valve deeper by. is removed from the height of the fully open valve in relation to the combustion chamber roof. In other words seating the valves .040" deeper gives you a fully open valve that is .040" closer to the roof of the chamber. The valve still travels the same distance, but it starts from behind in relation to how far it is away from the roof of the combustion chamber. Getting the party started at high RPM's can be effected by a valve not open as far into the combustion chamber. Only a dyno or flow bench can tell you how this effects your setup.
                        1981 GS1100E
                        1982 GS1100E



                        "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." Aristotle

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X