How's the CB1100 selling?

[Guest]

Triumph has been selling lots of Bonnevilles for years. So many that they recently expanded the lineup. Perhaps the CB1100s biggest problem is that lots of retro buyers would rather have a Bonneville.

[GS1150Pilot]

For $6K, I'd actually look closer. It would make a nice commuter/weekend trip bike.

[Nessism]

Well, I know it's an old thread, but obviously they aren't selling for SQUAT! You can pick up a brand new one now for almost half price!!!!

https://chicago.craigslist.org/nwi/m...237091922.html

Killer prices here. There are several bikes on this list that I'd love to have, including the CB1100!

[bonanzadave]

Dealer here still has an early 2014 black one he can't move.

Friend of mine just got one here in MN. 0 miles $8K

[850 Combat]

If you compare an '80-'81 GS1100E to the new Honda, there is not one thing that the GS doesn't do better than the new Honda. Acceleration, braking, handling, fuel economy, rider and passenger comfort, styling, etc.
The ONLY two things that the New Honda has over THE 30+ YEAR OLD SUZUKI is fuel injection and the fact that it is NEW and comes with a warranty. I will keep my Suzie's and my money thank you.

They don't charge exra for the depreciation, either. Like the GB500, it might get a following in 25 years. They were not selling in Anchorage.

[850 Combat]

I just think that a replica UJM should come with the versatility that UJMs had. And, for that matter, after Honda has had nearly 40 years to work on it, it should be faster than the real thing.

[GS1150Pilot]

The last few paragraphs in this Australian review seem to indicate that Honda got it about right. A bit skimpy on fuel capacity for such a modern day porker, but it sure seems to be a sweet ride.

http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/Honda/honda_cb1100%2010.htm

[Guest]

Cafe Racer magazine had an article about the CB1100 ? they did some mods to the motor. Might be worth reading if anyone finds a sweet deal but wants a bit more performance.




I have an 2009 Triumph Bonneville.
When I?m out riding, more people ask questions about that ?authentic? retro than ask questions about my ?real? retro bikes (GT750, XS650, CB650SC).
At bike shows its the opposite. The GT750 gets most of the questions.


So, perhaps the ?authentic? retro market isn?t a good market opportunity for a Honda four cylinder CB.

[Vmass]

6K for a new CB1100 sounds like a great deal. I have seen a couple retro paint jobs on this bike and it look awesome. Have seen it done in the cb900f silver scheme as well as an early 70's CB750 scheme.

[Guest]

6K for a new CB1100 sounds like a great deal. I have seen a couple retro paint jobs on this bike and it look awesome. Have seen it done in the cb900f silver scheme as well as an early 70's CB750 scheme.

I agree, at 6K you could probably throw a couple grand into it and have something special. Still can't believe Honda could make such a bike with less performance than it's 30 year old predecessor. Makes absolutely no sense.

[GS1150Pilot]

I'll admit that this price makes me look closer. I read a few articles last night that made me like the bike more than I did seven years back. In CB900f colors, it would be badass.

[Nessism]

Most people don't need tons of power. Look at the cruiser market for evidence. 70 hp at the rear wheel will get the rider in all kinds of trouble if they are not careful. I've owned cars that made less power. I agree with the general sentiment though; after 40 years we should get more of something. Power, (less) weight, better suspension, something. The performance of this bike doesn't move the needle enough considering all the years. I suppose it will be uber reliable, but GS bikes already have the covered. Regardless, it's a nice bike. And at the discounted price a great alternative for guys that may be eyeballing a cruizer. I'd much rather ride this thing than a Shadow.

[rphillips]

Agreed, as I'm not a cruiser person either. For me, I may be happier with a nice old Yam 750 triple, as mentioned somewhere else around here, Neither seem great at anything, were just OK for everything.

[GS1150Pilot]

More and more, that's just how I feel.

[Guest]

Most people don't need tons of power. Look at the cruiser market for evidence. 70 hp at the rear wheel will get the rider in all kinds of trouble if they are not careful. I've owned cars that made less power. I agree with the general sentiment though; after 40 years we should get more of something. Power, (less) weight, better suspension, something. The performance of this bike doesn't move the needle enough considering all the years. I suppose it will be uber reliable, but GS bikes already have the covered. Regardless, it's a nice bike. And at the discounted price a great alternative for guys that may be eyeballing a cruizer. I'd much rather ride this thing than a Shadow.

LOL. You just reminded me of a bit of amusement I had a long time ago.
Years ago I had a bike with 72 hp & a car with 86 hp.