fuelcock/petcock replacement

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 93Bandit
    replied
    Ah, it's non vacuum. Will probably work ok then.

    Leave a comment:


  • sacruickshank
    replied
    Originally posted by 93Bandit

    Wow, thanks for sharing! Did you just spin the wheel to decide which one to try? Or did you have one laying around?

    I'll be curious to find out if it's any better in quality and functional than the other Chinese petcocks.
    There was another similar thread where one of the posters recommended the XS option. Since I had already spent $20 on the Chinese vacuum version, I opted to take a chance on this non-vacuum version. I have a dremel tool, so if it didn't fit I could easily ream out the mounting holes a little.

    The function seems fine so far, but it's only been a day or so. The quality of the nipple outlet seems fine, but the 90deg elbows seem cheap.

    Here's the unit mounted
    PXL_20220728_222542910.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • 93Bandit
    replied
    Originally posted by sacruickshank
    for posterity, the $20 XS650 46-mm c-c non-vacuum petcock via Amazon had enough slack in the mounting hole size to fit my 44-mm Suzuki mounting holes. I did not have to ream anything out to make room.

    I used the rear exit shown in the pic as I didn't trust the the flimsy 90 deg exits fittings

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07T6T9G7C...roduct_details
    Wow, thanks for sharing! Did you just spin the wheel to decide which one to try? Or did you have one laying around?

    I'll be curious to find out if it's any better in quality and functional than the other Chinese petcocks.
    Last edited by 93Bandit; 07-28-2022, 05:56 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rphillips
    replied
    Don't lose that info. Very good for those that need it.

    Leave a comment:


  • sacruickshank
    replied
    for posterity, the $20 XS650 46-mm c-c non-vacuum petcock via Amazon had enough slack in the mounting hole size to fit my 44-mm Suzuki mounting holes. I did not have to ream anything out to make room.

    I used the rear exit shown in the pic as I didn't trust the the flimsy 90 deg exits fittings

    Leave a comment:


  • grcamna2
    replied
    Originally posted by bwringer
    Yeah, I also could not be trusted whatsoever with a manual petcock. My wife had a Honda with one aeons ago, and while I didn't do too bad turning it off (and fortunately it didn't fill the engine with gas if we forgot) neither of us was very good at turning the damn thing on until we tried to pull out onto the busy highway and the engine died...

    Anyhoo. Cycle Recycle II downtown (they're about 20-25 minutes from my house) would appear to have petcocks for Don's bike and many others, and in my experience these have worked well.
    https://newmotorcycleparts.net/fuel_...cocks_suz.html
    Does Cycle-recycle still sell used parts also ?

    Leave a comment:


  • 93Bandit
    replied
    I think you'll have to replace the diaphragm.

    There's got to be something we could do to make these Chinese petcocks work. There has to be. If I could get 3 or 4 I have a few ideas to try to see if I can make them work. There has to be a solution...

    Leave a comment:


  • sacruickshank
    replied
    Getting back to this thread ... re: the reliability of the cheap Amazon petcocks, mine worked fine until I took the back panel off to move the vacuum port to a better position. Then the fragile membrane tore a little and I now have a gas leak.

    Is there an easy DIY fix for the diaphragm? If not, I've already ordered one of the non-vacuum petcocks with 46mm hole spacing and will enlarge mounting holes if needed.

    Also, some of the cheapo petcocks have a longish arm that hits the valve cover (on my 550T) when you try to go to RES. I had to dremel it off.

    PXL_20220721_104815969.jpg
    Last edited by sacruickshank; 07-21-2022, 05:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    I have one of these on my tank and it works great: https://www.ebay.com/itm/293779800858

    Leave a comment:


  • sacruickshank
    replied
    Originally posted by dpep

    Would you by chance have a picture of one of these elbows attached to a petcock? I am having a hard time picturing a secure fitting.
    I don't have a pic. I don't try to connect them directly to a petcock, instead I use short pieces of fuel lines to connect the elbows and filters as needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • dpep
    replied
    Would you by chance have a picture of one of these elbows attached to a petcock? I am having a hard time picturing a secure fitting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    For you Canucks out there Amazon.ca has a three pack of 5/16 elbows for $13.99 and shipped by Amazon so free with prime or if order totals over 35 bux at:

    Leave a comment:


  • sacruickshank
    replied
    Originally posted by dpep

    Good idea. Do you have more detail on the product--picture or link perhaps? Most of what I saw was threaded and/or too thick to serve the purpose; hence the resort to thicker fuel line. But s proper fitting elbow would for sure be the better option.


    Leave a comment:


  • Gorminrider
    replied
    Anyways, thinking a little more about dpep's question... there's obviously quite a lot of pulsation when sampling vacuum at one carb especially at idle, so it's not hard to think that the little o-ring on the plunger would be wiggling in and out (wearing out ?) albeit "lubricated" by fuel somewhat.
    Against this idea, a good petcock lasts quite awhile so there must be some damping provided by the spring and the fuel....

    Leave a comment:


  • Gorminrider
    replied
    oh, Right! but however, I can't imagine how it's going to be wrecked per dpep's question on the vacuum side of the diaphragm...either the thing is made for an engine, or it's not made right. (barring some design involving pressure control like a fuel pump)

    Leave a comment:

Working...