$400 rectifer too much?

[CartoonLifeStyle]

Some of us have been here for a while sharing our hard won knowledge, and when someone disregards solid advice it's off putting.

I agree, but sometimes corners must be turned.

Treat every one with respect.

it's not rocket science.

peace

[JEEPRUSTY]

Ignore the ass holes on the site
they are always the usual suspects and are as predictable as they are useless basking in their own self-righteousness.

Yes hate ye not lest ye be Bard Award Winners or Super Site Supporters or whatever.

couple of proper tolls showed themselves for what they are in this thread.

[CartoonLifeStyle]

Ignore the ass holes on the site
they are always the usual suspects and are as predictable as they are useless basking in their own self-righteousness.

Yes hate ye not lest ye be Bard Award Winners or Super Site Supporters or whatever.

couple of proper tolls showed themselves for what they are in this thread.

Amen to that

[posplayr]

I agree, but sometimes corners must be turned.

Treat every one with respect.

it's not rocket science.

peace

There is another recent thread where there was a similar respondent who could not be bothered to do his own research or do his own legitimete analysis. The person apparently felt it appropriate to ask a question to which the answer was the board concensus. At which which to point the respondent ignored the consensus and started to hypothecate in imaginative notions of perfection devoid of any sense.

So the question is why ask such questions that result in summary consensus appraisals? Are you taking a poll? Can't you go read the information your self and sift through wat you whish to disregard. It seems implausibly ignorant to make a considered opinion Based on the filtered appraisal of a group of participants. Why analyze filtered data? The only reason is o conduct a poll and arguing with poll results would seem one of the most foolish things to do. You can certainly contradict a poll result but should that not be based on a considered appraisal of avaliable information?


No???

[JEEPRUSTY]

First mute point then Hypothesize made bastard?
Get a life and a grade school English program to go with your M of what? oh yes Engineering.

[posplayr]

First mute point then Hypothesize made bastard?
Get a life and a grade school English program to go with your M of what? oh yes Engineering.

Sorry jr I am unable to over come the iPhone and too lazy to get up. I also think I obviously have a much higher ahaul tolerance.


I'll have another 4 fingers and well see how you do.

You have a chance it is still before dinner and stomach is empty.

[JEEPRUSTY]

Sorry jr I am unable to over come the iPhone and too lazy to get up. I also think I obviously have a much higher ahaul tolerance.


I'll have another 4 fingers and well see how you do.

You have a chance it is still before dinner and stomach is empty.

Blame iphone blame Steve Jobs. Too lazy to correct typing is no less lazy than doing or not doing what you accuse others of.
Sad you used to stand for something unlike the usual suspects here.

[CartoonLifeStyle]

There is another recent thread where there was a similar respondent who could not be bothered to do his own research or do his own legitimete analysis. The person apparently felt it appropriate to ask a question to which the answer was the board concensus. At which which to point the respondent ignored the consensus and started to hypothecate in imaginative notions of perfection devoid of any sense.

So the question is why ask such questions that result in summary consensus appraisals? Are you taking a poll? Can't you go read the information your self and sift through wat you whish to disregard. It seems implausibly ignorant to make a considered opinion Based on the filtered appraisal of a group of participants. Why analyze filtered data? The only reason is o conduct a poll and arguing with poll results would seem one of the most foolish things to do. You can certainly contradict a poll result but should that not be based on a considered appraisal of avaliable information?


No???

The morning is wiser than the evening

[Allie]

Well this thread sure took off like a striped @ssed gazelle! Ya can't make someone follow your advice, even when it seems like a no brainer. Would it assuage the bitterness if I promise to go the SH775 rout when the smoke finally escapes from my stock charging system?

[Allie]

Blame iphone blame Steve Jobs. Too lazy to correct typing is no less lazy than doing or not doing what you accuse others of.
Sad you used to stand for something unlike the usual suspects here.

I haven't yet thought of a balm for your bitterness, you're a tough one. You don't even like muffins do you??

[JEEPRUSTY]

Balm? Balm of Gilead?
Balm of silly Gad?
Psalm of silly Shad?

You are either part of what I, at this moment, consider to the part of the solution or you are not.
That other thing is a logical fallacy.

[posplayr]

The morning is wiser than the evening

Ok then sleep on it and get back in the morning.

[posplayr]

Balm? Balm of Gilead?
Balm of silly Gad?
Psalm of silly Shad?

You are either part of what I, at this moment, consider to the part of the solution or you are not.
That other thing is a logical fallacy.

Logical fallacy for which there is no answer? Is that be cause it is illogical? But not that is not the charge. Is it for lack of reason ? No that is not the charge . It is because it is a fallacy? The question is a fallacy? Is that because it is retorical that the question be considered a fallacy? Is it not the bald retorical truth that makes the answer a fallacy ?

[posplayr]

Blame iphone blame Steve Jobs. Too lazy to correct typing is no less lazy than doing or not doing what you accuse others of.
Sad you used to stand for something unlike the usual suspects here.

Consider it aim intellegence test or a self worth test. You mistake me for someone with an irrational zeal for arbitrary standards.

[Allie]

Balm? Balm of Gilead?
Balm of silly Gad?
Psalm of silly Shad?

You are either part of what I, at this moment, consider to the part of the solution or you are not.
That other thing is a logical fallacy.

I'm always part of the solution, Jeeps... and that's your problem.