With the 1100G's bigger bore and 1.2mm longer stroke, Suzuki would have had to design either a larger combustion chamber and/or smaller piston domes into the 1074cc GS1100G.
Can anyone confirm if it was one or the other, or both? Or even better yet, has anyone calculated how much of a drop in compression ratio is to be had when putting the 1100G head onto a 1000 64.8mm stroke vs the 66mm stroke1100G crank? Assuming that the 1100G chambers are slightly larger? If 1085 Pistons are designed for the 1000 combustion chamber, and the 1100 G chamber is bigger, there would be a slight drop in compression. Is it typical to mill the head .020"-.040" or so (& then degree the cams with slotted speockets) in order to bump it back up?

Comment