After searching dozens of old Dyna 2000 & Dyna-S threads, I read Earlfor posting a few years ago saying that once he installed a dyna 2000, he decided immediately he would never go back to anything lesser. What are the biggest advantages to the Dyna 2000 on a 920cc 10:1 GS750 with Serdi radiused cut valve job, 4:1, K&N RC-2222 Dual oval filters, & VM29 smoothbores?
It seems as if you can set up the Dyna-S to get the same total Advance curve at high RPM, but the main advantage I see is that you can back off the advance at lower RPMs when you are running higher compression Pistons, to avoid detonation at lower rpm under heavy throttle, as well as likely having a programmed variable dwell on the 2000 that may let it idle better, vs a fixed dwell on the Dyna-S that is set broad enough for excellent high rpm operation but low rpm and idle is stuck with that high rpm dwell setting, which draws additional voltage and may detract from the idle.
Opinions?
It seems as if you can set up the Dyna-S to get the same total Advance curve at high RPM, but the main advantage I see is that you can back off the advance at lower RPMs when you are running higher compression Pistons, to avoid detonation at lower rpm under heavy throttle, as well as likely having a programmed variable dwell on the 2000 that may let it idle better, vs a fixed dwell on the Dyna-S that is set broad enough for excellent high rpm operation but low rpm and idle is stuck with that high rpm dwell setting, which draws additional voltage and may detract from the idle.
Opinions?
Last edited: