• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

How much for your new reg

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keith Winter
  • Start date Start date
Would the improved regulator design improve the charging system's capacity? I'd love to add electric grips to my GS850, but it's hard to decide if they would draw enough current to cause a problem.

On paper, anyway, e-grips would probably be OK, since everything is in good shape with my Honda reg/rect, but what about higher loads like an electric vest?

Of course, so much depends on the integrity of antique wiring that it would be impossible to make any guarantees.
 
Do they sell a version for my 1983 GS750T? I couldn't find it at Z-1 (but I might have missed it too).The combo kit sounds like the way to go. Help!?
 
Boondocks,
I just got time to look at the PDF file you posted,it look's almost the same as what Honda must use judgeing by the circuit layout. It is a improved version of the AC reg in that it use's transistor's instead of Zener diodes to fire the SCR's, BUT, as with all AC regulators the rectifier pack is conected direct to the bike and the battery. There is no way to get short circuit/ overload protection from a "better" AC reg. Also like the file states our stator's produce nearly constant current, this would happen when out on the highway at high rpm, and the bike simply does not need as much current to operate as is produced, so the battery has to absorb the extra. A DC regulator will regulate voltage AND current ALL the time so it will supply the battery and the bike with only what it needs AS it needs it. When in stop and go type riding a DC regulator will allow as much current to the bike as the stator will produce (till there is to much) this is almost like what a AC reg does, but because the voltage climbs up before the current and AC regulator will start shunting at low rpm's. This has a negative affect in that the bike is trying to draw current and the reg is shunting. With a DC reg the only job of the SCR is to limit the maximum AC output of the stator to what the rectifier diodes will handle. I am running 17.5 volts AC into my stock rectifier and have no heating problems. The big advantage to this is that low speed charging is improved and regulated in ways no AC regulator can even come close to matching. By allowing a higher AC voltage and current at slow speed operation and then regulating it on the bike side of the rectifier, the stator is shunted less resulting in less heat in the windings. Battery life is also increased as it no longer has to absorb any extra current at any rpm.
cloudbreakmd,
If you are talking about a DC regulator at Z-1 for your 750, no they don't. That's the idea of this post, nobody makes a better reg. This is my project, to build a better reg for ALL our bikes. This has been done and will soon be packaged. I started this post to get some input on the subject from everone out there. No point in tooling up to make allot of these things if no one wants to bother, I have spent enough cash already!
bwringer,
Saddly for us Mr Suzuki only had so much room for so much wire on the stator and nothing will make a big inprovement on the charging system capacity. Like I said before a DC reg will make slow speed charging more efficient, but we only have so much output at any rpm to play with. A DC reg will save your rec and stator from overload if you plug in to much stuff, all you will get is a low battery and not a rectifier that is on fire, but we only have about (at best) 15 amps at @13.5 volts or less. To blast down the highway with your headlight on highbeam, your ignition working right and allowing some margin for turn signals and brake lights requires about 10 amps max on the safe side. In reality this leaves us with about 5 amps left over if your stator is good. As most things are rated in WATT's, divide the watt's by 13.5 and you will get the amperage draw. So if your grip's say are 40 watt's this divided by 13.5 gives you 2.96 amps. I'm not really too sure how many amp's our stator's will put out as the 250 watt rating in the book does not state whether it's AC or DC. If it's 250 watt's at 80 volts AC the formula for figuring the available DC amperage becomes more complicated and I would have to look it up. And like you said the wiring and grounding becomes a issue as well.
Thanks for all the input.
Keith
 
Keith,

Just one other thought. Seeing as how you are the project engineer, I'll feed these dumb ideas to you. :) I was wondering if we could get better low RPM performance if we went with three bridge rectifiers instead of full wave. Just a thought...

Gary
 
Hi Gary,
There are some ideas that are dumb, but your's isn't one of them. In a round about way if we had too much voltage/ current this is what we would do and there is the problem. We don't have to much at low rpm, we have barely enough! All silicone doides used in rectifiers have resistance and therefore there is a voltage drop when current goes through them. It's about .7 of a volt per diode and we need 2 diodes per circuit in the stator output for our full wave rectifier. Each "leg" of the stator will drop 1.4 volts peak to peak from going through the diodes. If you add more diodes you drop more voltage. At higher rpm this would be great but down low in rpm the stator just won't put out enough and we would drop to much. There are relationships between voltage and current that most people don't understand, and I'm NOT saying you are one of them, but when dealing with stuff like this they are important. For example; how much voltage do we need for our bike's? The lights, ignition, battery, they are all 12 volt right? Do we need 14.5 to 15 volts? No we do not. We only NEED 13.5 volts to get the maximum life out of the battery and everything else. Our stators are wound with a certain size of wire stock and the size of this wire gives us the relationship. The smaller the wire the more of it can be wound on there the higher the induced voltage will be. However the smaller wire will pass less current and there is the relationship we are looking for. As current goes up voltage goes down, voltage up current down. This relationship can not be changed so it then becomes how much of each do you need. When making millions of bikes thick wire costs more than thin wire. Also as thick wire passes more current the SCR's in the regulator will have to be heavier duty along with the diodes in the rectifier, this also cost's more, so you make everything JUST enough to get by and still have the bare minimum to make things work. Can you see what I mean? I took this and applied it to my stator when I re-wound it. Do we really need 80 volts ac across each circuit, no we don't. I re-wound my stator with a thicker guage wire and lost about 5 wraps on each post. This means I get 50 volts ac across each set of wires instead of 80, but who cares as I get more of what I want and that is current. I still get more than 25 volts DC coming out of the rectifier with the reg unhooked. If I re-wind my stator again I will go with even bigger wire as even 25 volts is more than you need, but more current will be the result. Of course the stock reg now ran hotter than before and that's the begining of my DC reg project. And here's the answer to the low rpm charging. By increasing the current from the stator the low rpm voltage dropped, not to bad but it did drop, BUT by using a DC regulator that allows a higher AC voltage at low rpm compared to a ac reg this is off set and as the dc reg also regulates current (ac does not) as the current not needed is restricted by the regulator the voltage goes up! End result, better low speed charging. I am so bad at explaining things I hope this makes sense to anyone reading this! Back to work.
Keith
 
Keith, several thoughts for you - if you carry this beyond a one-off...

Size - I'm assuming your ideas would allow the reg/rect unit to occupy the same or smaller space. Currently, many of the aftermarket reg/rec units are larger than stock and this can present problems mounting them cleanly on some bikes.

Plug and play - this might be one of the tougher things - most people would prefer a total plug and play (idiot proof) replacement - as soon as you get into splicing, soldering or crimping wires, many folks will lose interest. It is currently difficult to get all the variants of connector blocks for all the bikes (currently in that situation with Ricks - we want them to produce a PNP reg/rect for some other bikes and we cannot get connector blocks at a decent price).

Resilience - it must be able to withstand weather, chemicals, heat and vibration, and last many years without degrading or failing.

Cost - be at a comparable cost level (or lower) to the Electrix or Rick's units otherwise most folks would shy away even if it's a better mousetrap.

-----------------------

Would your ideas work on all the charging system types? I know with other bikes (Honda / Kawasaki in particular) you get a variety of charging systems employed.
 
Hi Jeff,
Size is one of the problems that I have worked on. And there is no way to have a better system without more components. Keeping the heat dissipation good has also been a challenge. There is no way around it, it's going to be bigger than a stock unit. So far my unit is about half again bigger than a stock reg. There are so many configurations out there that packaging one rec/reg for all makes and models wasn't really my original plan. I have no plan's for mass production on a retail, mass sell sort of thing. I have to go to work like everyone else out there, this project for a better reg/rec was something I wanted for my bike's to solve the classic problem these old bike's came with, and being as I like playing around with electronic stuff, I gave it a go. Once I realized that charging system weakness in my bike was easy to overcome, I thought there might be others out there who want the same thing. For some the stock, or copies of stock, are good enough in a cost/function way. I'm not one of those type of people and if I can have something better I want it. I can live with the cost (if it's not too unreasonable) and if instalation is not to much of a extra hassle, I don't care. I posted this stuff to see what other people thought about it, as I'm sure I'm not alone in my ideas. I could speed up the building process somewhat with premade jigs and such, but to get and keep the quality I want everyone of these things would be hand built and tested. This IS just a hobby for me!
Now, the plug and play was the first issue. I have tested this on the bike many time's and I wanted to be able to plug and unplug anytime while out on the road, so yes, with the stock wiring on my bike(or any other bike with the same wiring) it is TOTALY idiot proof. It will not plug in wrong. If, of course, I made one for a different make and model I would need a schematic or a clear picture of the wiring to make it "plug and play" but as I would be hand building everyone of these, I don't see as that would be to much of a problem. Of course if the wiring is not stock and has already been butchered, that's a different story. In my ham radio hobby weird connections are a way of life and I have had to fabricate my share of connectors. I have no intentions of trying to get rich from this and, really, I don't care if not one single person out there want's one of these. If I have to make connectors/adapters, it's just time to me. I am quite familiar with the need for resilience, mostly from work with marine applications of electronic components. Once the final packaging is worked out, and as I already have the heat, short circuit, overload, problems solved, the rest will be relatively easy. The actual components should last a very long time as they are all three times heavier than they have to be. I have burned out ALLOT of stuff in my quest for reliability. One example; to test the filter capacitor on the input I ran the stator output unregulated into this reg on the highway in the bike with the headights turned off to get the worst case AC load that the reg will ever see. The first capacitor actualy blew up shorting the battery side of the reg to ground till the ground wire almost burned away. I saw this happen as I have a multi meter duct taped to the bars. This did not hurt the reg or the charging system in any way as the reg has circuits to shut down if this happens. Replace the ground wire, install heavier capacitor, test the reg (it still worked perfect) plug into the bike and try again. This is the kind of testing I did. And yes this DC system will work with any fixed magnet stator AC system on older bikes. It would not work with a automotive style altenator that the newer bikes come with. As long as the stator is putting out what it should be for the stock AC reg to work, a DC reg will work just fine.
Cost? Like I said, I built this for me. I have no plans to retire or get rich from this. The type of person that put's 98 cent a quart oil into their bikes will not be interested, but there are people out there who want better stuff and most of them know that better products DO cost more. Thanks for your comments Jeff, the more input the better.
Keith
 
Keep us all posted with your progress. I'm interested just from a curiousity perspective.
 
Hi Keith,
I've been having this discussion on a Honda CX500 forum for a few weeks as well:
http://cx500.gobinet.se/smb/thread.cfm?TID=2345
Have you progressed any further with your regulator?
I have found a few ads for "series" regulators (as opposed to "shunt type"), eg:
http://www.cyclecustomizing.com/products/cycle_electric_regulators_7996.html
But I'm not convinced they actually are what they suggest they are....
I contacted one of the importers here in Australia and was told it was a "ceramic series hybrid" type regulator - whatever that is.... "made in the USA that have the latest technology"..... not that helpful....
Let me know if I can help with prototype development (I'm handy at measuring, soldering and mechanical construction, but not an electronics engineer :? ...
Cheers,
 
Just a few comments on this project. I do believe it is worthwhile to upgrade the charging system but there are a few other things you need to consider.

1) A generator is NOT a constant current source device. Its output current depends on the load presented to it. Consequently, the battery DOES NOT have to "soak" up any extra current.

The problem is that the voltage presented to the battery is higher than the float voltage of the battery thereby overcharging the battery causing heat stress and boiling of the electrolyte.

A solution is to keep the output voltage at 13.6 volts. However, this means you have two voltage sources in parallel (i.e. something like two batteries in parallel) and the one with the lower resistance will provide the most current to the systems on the motorcycle. This will quite likely be the battery unless your regulator is carefully designed. So now you are back to discharge/charge cycles on the battery which reduces its life.

This is the point where product testing is important. Just what voltage is needed to maximize the life of the battery?

2) The input filter capacitor on your first system blew because of the AC voltage from the generator. Look at the sizes of AC moter capacitors and you will see they are very large in order to handle the AC. I suspect you will not have very good reliability (i.e. years) from this part if you use a standard electrolytic and continually subject it to large AC voltages.

The solution is to probably put a diode in each of the stator winding legs to create an unfiltered DC voltage. The diode is a simple half-wave rectifier and will keep the large negative AC swings from the DC regulator and its associated input filter capacitor.

3) This goes along with (2). Put your rectifier (the diode in each stator lead) in front of the DC regulator. That IS what your designing, a DC regulator. Give it DC to begin with, not AC!

Leaving a rectifier after the regulator is redundant and doesn't allow the voltage regulator to directly read the battery voltage because of the diode voltage drop. The rectifier after the regulator will give some protection to the regulator against someone hooking up jumper leads backwards, but there are other ways to provide this protection.


Overall, a good project! Getting rid of the shunt regulator will dramatically reduce the power and heat generated in the stator and regulator. The existing shunt regulator simply shorts out the stator making it supply full current during the time overvoltage is occuring thereby creating a lot of extra heat both in the stator and the SCR in the regulator. This is an unnecessary waste.
 
Keith Winter
For example; how much voltage do we need for our bike's? The lights, ignition, battery, they are all 12 volt right? Do we need 14.5 to 15 volts? No we do not. We only NEED 13.5 volts to get the maximum life out of the battery and everything else.

See my comment above about sources in parallel. You DO need something more than 13.6 volts in order for the generator to supply most of the current the bike needs. How much more depends on the resistive losses in the wiring and battery lifetime.

You must determine the best charge/discharge cycle rate versus battery overcharging in order to know the absolute value to use. You have to run tests to determine this. My guess is that something like 14 volts is probably close.

Our stators are wound with a certain size of wire stock and the size of this wire gives us the relationship. The smaller the wire the more of it can be wound on there the higher the induced voltage will be. However the smaller wire will pass less current and there is the relationship we are looking for. As current goes up voltage goes down, voltage up current down. This relationship can not be changed so it then becomes how much of each do you need. When making millions of bikes thick wire costs more than thin wire. Also as thick wire passes more current the SCR's in the regulator will have to be heavier duty along with the diodes in the rectifier, this also cost's more, so you make everything JUST enough to get by and still have the bare minimum to make things work. Can you see what I mean? I took this and applied it to my stator when I re-wound it. Do we really need 80 volts ac across each circuit, no we don't. I re-wound my stator with a thicker guage wire and lost about 5 wraps on each post. This means I get 50 volts ac across each set of wires instead of 80, but who cares as I get more of what I want and that is current. I still get more than 25 volts DC coming out of the rectifier with the reg unhooked. If I re-wind my stator again I will go with even bigger wire as even 25 volts is more than you need, but more current will be the result.

Be careful here. Smaller wire doesn't pass less current. What happens is the resistance of the smaller wire results in voltage loss and more heat generation than larger wire.

Your assumption that a generator is a constant current source is faulty. A generator is NOT a contant current source. You may be too young to remember cars, trucks, and tractors with generators and ammeters.

Put an ammeter in series with the lead to your battery to check this! Now check with a discharged battery. You will get a lot of current. Then put a fully charged battery in and check again. Your current will be reduced to a low value.

The voltage AND current the stator can generate is really based upon the number of lines of magnetic flux being cut in a given unit of time. This is why the voltage (and consequently the current available) goes up as you speed up the generator. Smaller wire, i.e. more windings, will give you more lines of magnetic flux being cut in a revolution which will give a higher capability of current and voltage. On the other hand, you WILL have more resistive losses in the smaller wire that cause more heat. There is a tradeoff here. The only way to know the best solution is to put a variable load on the generator (like a battery tester) and check the voltage and current available with each wire size.

I would hope Suzuki did this testing and used the best solution. On the other hand, manufacturing costs do play a part and may not give exactly the best solution.
 
wiring a honda R/R to a 77 GS 550

wiring a honda R/R to a 77 GS 550

Hi, I never got a response on my request for help, I assume this is different than the others as it has a voltage regulator and a rectifier. Anyone out there inclinded to help. Dale
 
Hi,
Boy do I hate work, it sure mess's with one's hobby. Anyway, were do I start. jimg; You are starting to scare me! First off I guess we better clear up the fact that these bike's do NOT have generators , they have alternators. I AM old enough to remember cars, mine as well, that had generators, AND the cars that had the first alternators with external regulators both mechanical AND electronic. You are right though about none of this being constant current and in one of my post's I think I mentioned this. No matter WHAT we do nothing is going to be constant as we don't have an adjustable electro magnetic feild to play with, like car charging systems have! And actualy NO 12 volt battery need's more than 2.3 volts per cell, this of coarse is 13.8 volts maximum, to get the most life. It might interest you to know that at a volts per cell range of between 2 minimum and 2.3 maximum you can expect 200 or more cycles of charge out of any given battery, but if you go up or down as little as .25 of a volt of this rate the cycle rate will drop to about 50 before reduced storage capacity will start to take affect. If you would like to know more about ALL types of batteries, check out the ARRL Handbook any library should have them. Now, as far as your sources in parallel, the stator winding's are NOT in parallel they are in the classic "WYE" configuration, 3 set's of coils with the output taken from 2 set's in series as the flywheel/magnet spins around them, each set of coils on each "leg" of the WYE are also in series, add them up and this gives us the 50 or more volts across each set of wire's. If the stator was wound in a "DELTA" configuration then we would have something closer to the parallel system that you were talking about. We have, hopefully, cleared up the charge/ discharge cycle rate already, and the 13.8 max. battery voltage so what's left is the current demands that the bike needs. This is really an easy one, like you said, stick an amperage meter between the rectifier and the battery and measure the draw, with a fully charged battery of course. It should be very close to what the WATTAGE of everything running on the bike is. You can also get a very close guess by adding up the wattages in the book as well, of course you have to know what the ignition draws, but it probably is less than two amps. And also I'll give you the "smaller wire doesn't pass less current" thing, but, and you may know this, most people have a hard time understanding that electrons move on the OUTside of a conductor, not through it. So to explain in detail wire size versus current flow and voltage drop,,, well it's simple enough to say and understand that smaller wire will conduct less current. Oh and by the way, small wire does not mean voltage loss, the resistance in a wire is to current not voltage. A 2000 volt ceramic capacitor has leads a little bigger than a human hair and they are de-rated, the maximum that they will handle is almost 4000 volts and then it's the ceramic that burns out, not the wire. And also the size of wire WILL have a affect on current output, have you ever done any work with transformers? In every transformer I have ever seen the secondary VOLTAGE is completely based on how many windings there are in relation to the primary windings. With any set amount of input (or magnetic flux lines) the output voltage will be higher with more windings in the secondary than the primary, and visa versa of course, BUT the more windings in the secondary to increase voltage the less usable CURRENT you will have in the secondary. The reasons for this are not important to most out there but if anyone has a hard time understanding why you can't have both in something as small as our stators, look at a big ARC WELDER. An arc welder has both current AND voltage, does anybody want to pack one of THOSE around on their bikes? OK, back to the parallel thing, you almost have it right, BUT, we only have 1 diode for + and 1 diode for -- on each leg AC of the stator so these are not parallel on the input side. If we had 2 diodes for each positive and negative swing then we WOULD have to address the resistance of each diode and have equalizing resistors for them for the current, but this is not the case as the only time this need's to be done is if the diode's used can not handle the current draw, and diodes are cheaply available that can take WAY more current than out stators could ever hope to produce.
Also AC motor capacitors are there for STARTING the motor NOT AC filtering as in my reg project. I'm not really too sure where you got the idea that I was trying to get DC from the capacitor, and I really don't know why I would want to put diodes in the stator when my reg HAS a diode rectifier ahead of the DC regulator anyway. I think somewhere along the line you have become confused, no DC regulator I know of can regulate an AC input. There are what they call "switching reg's" but even they need a DC input, so I'm not to sure what you mean. Maybe you got the term "wrap around" mixed up. This has nothing to do with diodes or AC or capacitors, this is the reg circuit that DOES read the output to the battery and also allows short/overload protection. Anyway, the off/on action of the SCR type reg is crap, and the reasons are pretty clear to most out there. And jimg maybe I better way to put it is, the battery has to absorb the SHOCK of the off/on SCR reg and as the SCR reg is a off and on switch( with no inbetween) it is also turning off and on the current as well, and this IS NOT good for the battery no matter how fast it can turn off and on. Get yourself a copy of the ARRL Handbook and check it out.
I have the rec/reg all packaged, for anyone following this, and have been heat and overload testing it. I can say honestly that short of your bike catching fire and melting the whole unit, it will sense and shut down if the temperature get's to critical. The reg has been heated with a propane torch to test this, and short of riding into a volcano or something, heat will not hurt anything. When the housing get's to hot to touch is when the limiting starts to take place, and if the outside air temp got that hot, well you wouldn't still be riding anyway! I can adjust when the temperature starts to shut it down, and I might make it limit at a lower temp, but it does work and thats all that I want out of it. I will try to check back on here more often to address any input, sorry but the working life really sucks!
Keith
 
Keith Winter said:
I thought there might be others out there who want the same thing... I have no intentions of trying to get rich from this and, really, I don't care if not one single person out there wants one of these.

I'll bet there's quite a few of us here who would be interested in the whole system, reg, rect, and stator. I spent $130USD for an Electrex RR and then another $150 for an Electrex stator incl. shipping and while the charging system is working well at the moment, I keep my fingers crossed (not while riding :wink: ). Those parts were not quite plug and play, I still had to shorten the stator leads and solder on connectors. The idea of rectifying first then having a DC regulator that doesn't waste power AND protects the battery and stator? Gotta like that!! Why couldn't they build 'em that way in the first place? They are Japanese aren't they? Same as Sony and Panasonic etc. How much would these custom Winter engineered parts cost? I think lots of people would be willing to pay $300 or more for something that works great. If the battery lasts twice as long with this charging system that's $40 saved. The longer the battery lasts the more the cost of the Winter system is offset. Kudos!! I wish I hadn't spent my money on the Electrex parts now. I would have spent the summer putting the bike on the charger every night if I had known something like this was possibly going to be available...
 
Re: Rectifier and regulator wiring 1977 GS550

Re: Rectifier and regulator wiring 1977 GS550

dale schafer said:
Can someome draw me a schematic to wire a S/H 232-12 one piece rectifier/regulator for a Honda to a 1977 GS 550 with SEPERATE regulator and rectifier. The S/H 232-12 has 3 yellow wires, these should go to the stator. It has one red wire that I assume goes to the fused power supply (Tail light?). Then it has a green wire that I read should go to the ground on the battery box and on to the negitive terminal of the battery. It also has a small brown wire,. I do not have the bike at my location so I can not look at it now. A schematic would show me what to do with the wiring and also that which goes to the GS 550 seperate regulator. I have the Honda rectifier/regulator in my possesion, Your help would be appriciated. Dale

Dale,

These guys are too busy with their technical sabre rattling to address your question. :D The three yellow wires of the new regulator go to the bike's stator wires. The red wire should go to the red wire that was in the bike's factory connector that also contained the stator connections. The green wire should go to ground. The brown wire is the sense wire for the regulator. Connect it to a positive switched source, such as the tail light circuit.

Gary
 
Dale, I think you got the answer you needed...so i'm sorry for this post.

I'm not trying to rattle a sabre just trying to refresh my memory. we all are just trying to learn and give our help to each other correct?

Keith if i remember correctly at low frequency (starting with d.c.) electrons travel through the conductor until the frequency increases and then they travel on the outside of the conductor (skin effect) am i correct? it's been a long time.

Boy do I like learning and learning and learning (maybe relearning?) what i forgot...
 
My "sabre rattling" comment was supposed to be funny. I love tech discussions. I agree with rustybronco. I'm afraid that in order to get any skin effect going on, the engine would have to be turning a little too fast. If skin effect was present at low frequencies, I could wire my house with copper plated wire instead of solid copper. But, alas.....
 
Hey all,
I thought the sabre rattling comment was great! And Ian, thanks for your input AND price stuff. Now, you guy's HAVE found a flaw in my babble and this causes me to think that I've really overloaded what brain cells I have left working! It would take me day's to find the info we need on THIS subject, but, yes the lower the freq. the more electrons travel through a conductor. I am not going to say I actually remember the fine points of how to calculate electron flow on the conductor as opposed to through the wire, and we would have to know how many cycles per second (Hz) our stators are making at what rpm, the resistance of how many feet of wire on each post of the stator, AND probably at least a WEEK with a calculator AND my wife at this point would surely serve me with divorce papers.....needless to say, and remember how bad I am at explainations, we are dealing with AC in our stator windings and this will cause some loss through the wire and with our very limited amount of power, AC, I guess I should have said that there is a skin affect and resistance " through" the wire. Thanks you guy's for keeping me honest! My problem is, like most out there, I do this stuff when I get home from the daily grind and what little mind I have left working just want's to shut off instead of sorting out electronic theory AND trying to explain it, sorry.
And sorry to you too Dale, for it taking so long to get an answer to your question!
NOW, one of the past question's we had on this post was something like " would this reg increase the amount of power output for extra light's, ect" or at least it was something like that. And of course the answer to this was a no, BUT, it did get me thinking about that. As allot of you know living here in the frozen wasteland of Canada is not good for even half a year of "on road" motorcycle testing. So I started to look into way's I could reproduce the 3 phase output of our stator's in my basement, as it's not allot of fun trying to work with this stuff outside when it's frozen and snowing. There MAY be a way to re-configure the stator windings and get more power out of them. This statement could cause an explosion of "sabre rattle" so the word, "MAY" has to be remembered here. Hopefully this weekend I will get out and do some test's on my bike and stator. How much more power remains to be seen, and it may produce a unworkable voltage, AND, of course the stator would have to be re-wound to put things to a real test, but it may be possible. A quik check on my worn out calculator shows that a SCR type reg rated for the stock winding system might not last to long, and that might explain why they never did this when these bikes were new. I'm fairly sure I'll find a flaw in this, but we will never know till it's checked. Thanks for the input and if there is anyone out there that has tried a different winding configuration, let us know!
Keith
 
Back
Top