Hard to imagine they would use foot forward bikes as trainers, it's just so wrong. Probably they take what they can get. Get the TU 250 and give Earlfor a ride report when you finish!
-
Required reading for all forum users!!!
Welcome!
Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.A note to new registrants...
All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.A Special Note about Email accounts!
DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.A note to old forum members...
I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.
Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...
-
Returning Visitors
If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.
If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.
Hard to imagine they would use foot forward bikes as trainers, it's just so wrong. Probably they take what they can get. Get the TU 250 and give Earlfor a ride report when you finish!
S
srg
Guest
Nice story about it! My class didn't mention the drag affect thing, that's interesting. I'll have to try it. I had no problem with the clutch/throttle, as I drive a manual transmission car, but I did have trouble with the "going slow" maneuvers - The figure 8's at low speed and such. I suppose that comes with time/practice.
Almost all bikes have wet clutches, meaning the clutch plates are immersed in engine oil. That's why people recommend using engine oil with a JASO-MA certification, like Rotella T. JASO is the Japanese Automotive Standards Organization for use with 4-stroke motorcycle engines and wet clutches.
Riding a wet clutch wont stress it as badly as riding a dry clutch, but it still puts pressure on the springs and does wear the plates down, albeit a much slower rate. So generally, it's ok to do when learning. I'd be conscious not to get into a habit though.
Last edited:
But not for too long, and not reving engine too much.
THe important thing to learn (and you have) is that the clutch does not have only two positions (pulledin, let out) but has many positions.
I like to explain the many positions like this:
- Pulled in.
- let out to were barley grabbing.
- little little bit more.
- little bit more
- little bit more
- little bit more
- little bit more
- and little bit more till fully engaged (all these "little bit more" over not much range)
- then all the way out
Do tell us about the 2nd day.
I too saw one person give up after having some trouble.
And another person was having great trouble, was running wild across the course, come to an abrupt stop with engine reving yet, and dump it. YIKES. Had one instructor give some individual instruction away from everyone else for most of the afternoon, and was told not to return for the next day. Which I though was the instructors going "above and beyond".
One teenage boy, that claimed to have "dirt bike experience" was having trouble, and his mom, who stated no experience, was doing great. Eventually he did okay.
When I had my conversation with the instructor, he had asked me why I keep two fingers on the controls. Maybe he meant why was I not doing it like he suggested. I said I figured that was good advice for a novice, but I was following recommendation of the Hurt Report (1982?), and have that habit, and kept reverting back to that habit. (I was not purposely trying to be defiant, just wasn't making much effort to change.) That is when instructor put his arm across my shoulder, and his face right in my helmet openings, and said that I could do it how ever I wanted after the class, but many points will be deducted during the test if I don't do it that way there. Oh. Okay, I understand.
.
Last edited:
Replies
Replies
OMG! That is pretty much why I said what I said above Redman's conversation with the instructor's recommendations. {Do it and move on} Lord knows I wouldn't wanna pay for an MSF Course only to have a possible Failing Grade due to me "not following instruction".
Ed
Replies
OMG! That is pretty much why I said what I said above Redman's conversation with the instructor's recommendations. {Do it and move on} Lord knows I wouldn't wanna pay for an MSF Course only to have a possible Failing Grade due to me "not following instruction".
Ed
W
winfield
Guest
Day 2
Day 2
Well, it's over. Today we met at 7 am in order to complete one of the skills we should have finished the first day. In addition, we had 8 more skills to learn and practice for today, plus finish the book part of it.
This day was much more fun for two reasons. First, we combined several skills at a time which meant we were actually riding without stopping a lot more. Some of these skills were emergency stopping, short u-turns (basically figure 8s), estimating proper speed into a turn after acceleration requiring braking prior to entry into the turn, turning head and looking at the destination, and roll on the throttle. Other skills were swerving to miss an obstacle, practicing outside-inside-outside on different radius turns (90 degrees and 135 degrees), riding over an object (a 2 x 4), and other things I don't recall right now.
The test consisted of two separate courses. We practiced them both about four times apiece before the tests were administered. The first test began with acceration to 12-15 mph and go between two cones. At the cones you were to begin an emergency stop and stop as quickly as possible. They measure the distance of the stop and took points off if you didn't meet certain parameters. You then circled around to another starting point that led to the part with the double u-turns that had to be completed within a boxed-in area. This was accomplished using the friction zone-elevated rpms-drag on back brake method. After completing the u-turns (figure 8) you accelerated and shifted into second gear reaching a speed between 12-18 mph (yes, flying I know). Maintain that speed until you go between two cones at which point you had to swerve right, then left, which straightened you up, and then stop as quickly as possible (clutch-downshift-brake-brake-stop).
The second course started with a sweeping turn through which you shifted into 2nd gear and accelerated to 12-18 mph. Once reaching speed you needed to slow to a speed that would allow you to enter a 135 degree turn and roll on the throttle and out the other end while staying between the cones and lines. They were looking for smoothness in the turn as you roll on, not off and on the throttling. They also timed you through this course to see if you completed it within the specified time. In other words, you had to do it with a certain speed.
It was clear during the practice that several riders really had trouble with the u-turns and a couple riders just had trouble riding efficiently at all. The truck driver was having the most trouble. I don't think he ever reached over 10 mph in any of the practice sessions. He wobbled often, put his feet down, and stopped where he wasn't supposed to or failed to stop when required. At the start of the test we were told that putting a foot down or riding outside the lines or any other number of riding errors would result in point deductions--even not attaining the target mph range. Only two things would result in automatic disqualification: 1) purposely operating the bike in an unsafe manner; 2) crashing or dropping the bike in the test. If you got enough deductions you could also fail.
Well the first guy maneuvered each of the tests almost without error. Both of the remaining women had lots of trouble with the u-turns going outside of the box. One needed a second try at the emergency stop, resulting in deductions. One of the men also went way wide on the u-turns but did alright on the rest of the course, though with difficulty. The truck driver began the u-turns and could not coordinate the friction zone higher revs and rear brake drag. In the first turn he began to wobble and then the bike dumped over. He rolled head over heels and then picked himself up off the pavement. We were told to shut off our bikes. The instructor picked up his bike and both instructors walked the truckdriver inside the building. He came out a short time later carrying his stuff and he said good bye and left the premises. He was DQ'd. Everyone else made it through the course, some with difficulty. I made it through the u-turns with relative smoothness and then accelerated. I missed second gear
but hit it very quickly and then approached the place to swereve and stop and had no trouble. I had no trouble with the second course.
All 6 of us passed the skills tests. The we went in for the written test. When it was over, we could ask the instructor to see our scores. I received no deductions in the skill tests and a 100% on the written test. I got my MSF card with a perfect score. I must say that with the experience I have, the skills came fairly easily to me. I did need one time through a skill before I could do it smoothly. I did learn from the course and found it worthwhile. I took the course for my own self-improvement. I already have my licence and was not forced to take it because of a traffic violation. I would consider doing the next level course with my own bike. I recommend the course to both novice and experienced riders. Especially if you are like me and went several years without riding and picked it up again. It will refresh your skills.
There is my report. Questions or comments?
Day 2
Well, it's over. Today we met at 7 am in order to complete one of the skills we should have finished the first day. In addition, we had 8 more skills to learn and practice for today, plus finish the book part of it.
This day was much more fun for two reasons. First, we combined several skills at a time which meant we were actually riding without stopping a lot more. Some of these skills were emergency stopping, short u-turns (basically figure 8s), estimating proper speed into a turn after acceleration requiring braking prior to entry into the turn, turning head and looking at the destination, and roll on the throttle. Other skills were swerving to miss an obstacle, practicing outside-inside-outside on different radius turns (90 degrees and 135 degrees), riding over an object (a 2 x 4), and other things I don't recall right now.
The test consisted of two separate courses. We practiced them both about four times apiece before the tests were administered. The first test began with acceration to 12-15 mph and go between two cones. At the cones you were to begin an emergency stop and stop as quickly as possible. They measure the distance of the stop and took points off if you didn't meet certain parameters. You then circled around to another starting point that led to the part with the double u-turns that had to be completed within a boxed-in area. This was accomplished using the friction zone-elevated rpms-drag on back brake method. After completing the u-turns (figure 8) you accelerated and shifted into second gear reaching a speed between 12-18 mph (yes, flying I know). Maintain that speed until you go between two cones at which point you had to swerve right, then left, which straightened you up, and then stop as quickly as possible (clutch-downshift-brake-brake-stop).
The second course started with a sweeping turn through which you shifted into 2nd gear and accelerated to 12-18 mph. Once reaching speed you needed to slow to a speed that would allow you to enter a 135 degree turn and roll on the throttle and out the other end while staying between the cones and lines. They were looking for smoothness in the turn as you roll on, not off and on the throttling. They also timed you through this course to see if you completed it within the specified time. In other words, you had to do it with a certain speed.
It was clear during the practice that several riders really had trouble with the u-turns and a couple riders just had trouble riding efficiently at all. The truck driver was having the most trouble. I don't think he ever reached over 10 mph in any of the practice sessions. He wobbled often, put his feet down, and stopped where he wasn't supposed to or failed to stop when required. At the start of the test we were told that putting a foot down or riding outside the lines or any other number of riding errors would result in point deductions--even not attaining the target mph range. Only two things would result in automatic disqualification: 1) purposely operating the bike in an unsafe manner; 2) crashing or dropping the bike in the test. If you got enough deductions you could also fail.
Well the first guy maneuvered each of the tests almost without error. Both of the remaining women had lots of trouble with the u-turns going outside of the box. One needed a second try at the emergency stop, resulting in deductions. One of the men also went way wide on the u-turns but did alright on the rest of the course, though with difficulty. The truck driver began the u-turns and could not coordinate the friction zone higher revs and rear brake drag. In the first turn he began to wobble and then the bike dumped over. He rolled head over heels and then picked himself up off the pavement. We were told to shut off our bikes. The instructor picked up his bike and both instructors walked the truckdriver inside the building. He came out a short time later carrying his stuff and he said good bye and left the premises. He was DQ'd. Everyone else made it through the course, some with difficulty. I made it through the u-turns with relative smoothness and then accelerated. I missed second gear
but hit it very quickly and then approached the place to swereve and stop and had no trouble. I had no trouble with the second course. All 6 of us passed the skills tests. The we went in for the written test. When it was over, we could ask the instructor to see our scores. I received no deductions in the skill tests and a 100% on the written test. I got my MSF card with a perfect score. I must say that with the experience I have, the skills came fairly easily to me. I did need one time through a skill before I could do it smoothly. I did learn from the course and found it worthwhile. I took the course for my own self-improvement. I already have my licence and was not forced to take it because of a traffic violation. I would consider doing the next level course with my own bike. I recommend the course to both novice and experienced riders. Especially if you are like me and went several years without riding and picked it up again. It will refresh your skills.
There is my report. Questions or comments?
Last edited:
W
winfield
Guest
Tu250
Tu250
I agree, TKent02. In fact, on my evaluation of the course I said it could be improved by doing away with the cruiser type bikes and only using bikes that have a standard bike sitting position. To ask beginners to maneuver a bike for the first time from a sitting position that makes control more difficult does not make sense to me. I suppose they do this for two reasons: 1) they were able to purchase cruiser-types for a cheap price; 2) they know many of their students will purchase cruisers after the class so they want them to get used to riding them. The Suzuki GN125 had a good sitting position, though the handle bars are back a little too far for me. The Suzuki TU250 was more like it. Looks like a Triumph and has the standard bike sitting position. Rear brake lever is situated under the foot peg and just in front of it for easy operation with a downward motion of the toes, unlike the GZ250 I rode the first day.
The second day was much more enjoyable and perhaps the main reason is because they had 2 TU250s and I got to ride one of them on the second day instead of the Suzuki GZ250. Have I mentioned that I hate cruisers? This is for Earlfor. This is a fuel injected bike. It fired right up and idled perfectly. The controls were all very accessible and worked as they should. We were only allowed to use first and second gears. My rider is a Z1 so how do I compare a 250? I can't comment on the spread of all 5 gears since I only used two. In order to get to 15-20 mph you need to shift into second. It is very easy to shift (despite my mistake mentioned in other post), runs smoothly and responds well to the throttle. The seat has two pads. I would have liked the first pad to be a little longer/further back. I am 6 ft tall, and weigh 200 and none-of-your business. Actually, in the upper 200s. The seat leaves a little to be desired as my behind got a bit tired during all the skill practice. Though I doubt Suzuki expected someone of my size to ride this bike. My legs were a bit cramped on the bike but I generally like the sitting position. The other thing I would ad is that the handle bars were a little narrow for me. A smaller guy may find them to be perfect, but I like a little bit wider bar. I liked the distance the bars were from me after sitting on that cruiser the first day and having the bars swooped back and turned slightly inward. I like to reach forward for the handlebars and with a slight lean. Hardly any weight on wrists.
If money were no object I would not hesitate to get this as a starter bike for my teenage son. It is docile and works smoothly. It does not present any unnecessary complication to the learning process for a new rider. Plus, it looks like a classic motorcycle. Earlfor, or any others, do you have any questions?
Tu250
I agree, TKent02. In fact, on my evaluation of the course I said it could be improved by doing away with the cruiser type bikes and only using bikes that have a standard bike sitting position. To ask beginners to maneuver a bike for the first time from a sitting position that makes control more difficult does not make sense to me. I suppose they do this for two reasons: 1) they were able to purchase cruiser-types for a cheap price; 2) they know many of their students will purchase cruisers after the class so they want them to get used to riding them. The Suzuki GN125 had a good sitting position, though the handle bars are back a little too far for me. The Suzuki TU250 was more like it. Looks like a Triumph and has the standard bike sitting position. Rear brake lever is situated under the foot peg and just in front of it for easy operation with a downward motion of the toes, unlike the GZ250 I rode the first day.
The second day was much more enjoyable and perhaps the main reason is because they had 2 TU250s and I got to ride one of them on the second day instead of the Suzuki GZ250. Have I mentioned that I hate cruisers? This is for Earlfor. This is a fuel injected bike. It fired right up and idled perfectly. The controls were all very accessible and worked as they should. We were only allowed to use first and second gears. My rider is a Z1 so how do I compare a 250? I can't comment on the spread of all 5 gears since I only used two. In order to get to 15-20 mph you need to shift into second. It is very easy to shift (despite my mistake mentioned in other post), runs smoothly and responds well to the throttle. The seat has two pads. I would have liked the first pad to be a little longer/further back. I am 6 ft tall, and weigh 200 and none-of-your business. Actually, in the upper 200s. The seat leaves a little to be desired as my behind got a bit tired during all the skill practice. Though I doubt Suzuki expected someone of my size to ride this bike. My legs were a bit cramped on the bike but I generally like the sitting position. The other thing I would ad is that the handle bars were a little narrow for me. A smaller guy may find them to be perfect, but I like a little bit wider bar. I liked the distance the bars were from me after sitting on that cruiser the first day and having the bars swooped back and turned slightly inward. I like to reach forward for the handlebars and with a slight lean. Hardly any weight on wrists.
If money were no object I would not hesitate to get this as a starter bike for my teenage son. It is docile and works smoothly. It does not present any unnecessary complication to the learning process for a new rider. Plus, it looks like a classic motorcycle. Earlfor, or any others, do you have any questions?
Last edited:
I like the looks of that little rascal, traditional, naked and simple. The TU250 looks like a smaller version of a GS425 I bought new many years ago. It does look notably smaller though. Maybe the rider in this picture is just really big however. LOL Hopefully I would fit. heh eh
...and they are fuel-injected, if I remember correctly. Thought about replacing the Rebel with one, as my vertically-challenged girlfriend really grooves on the style and size.
That rider has to be quite tall as I'm 5'10", and didn't feel it was particularly small.
That rider has to be quite tall as I'm 5'10", and didn't feel it was particularly small.
W
winfield
Guest
Yes, FI. Started up nicely and purred at an idle. I think the rider in Earlfor's post is less than 6 ft because when I sat on the bike I could feel the second pad of the seat touching my behind. Wasn't uncomfortable, but I noticed it. The other guy in the class who rode the TU250 was also 6 ft but thin--didn't have a belly. He was also back against the pad and overall he looked a bit too tall for the bike.
G
Guest
Guest
I lucked out on my MSF course. The course was laid out on an abandon runway at the old airport, so we had room to spare. Enough room so that all the riders could be doing something different and two instructors to watch over 7 of us. One of the neat things we did were some moderate to high speed runs on the runways. Some of us got up to about 70 and left the others behind lol. We also played follow the leader. One of the instructors would lead on a bike and we just follow him all over the old airport. On pavement, off pavement, get some speed, corners we had it all. I believe the bike I had was a Suzuki GS450 or something like that. It was the only bike that really fit me, the others were too small, mostly 250s. We had a mix of every Japanese make it seemed.
Last edited: