G
Guest
Guest
While VH headers probably had alot of reasearch put into them they were more or less designed (at least your standard street pipe/Meg ) were made for practical performance eg Joe motorbike to toss on his machine without questioning weather or not other areas of the rpm ranges would be negatively effected. Midpipes on
Massive top end rush is the result. One pipe I have (SuperTrapp) with a large pipeset makes my 1100E take off like it was shot out of a cannon from about 6K on. The VH pipe like Joe posted up on the same bike tuned to it resulted in a very punchy midrange ( really nice for standard street riding) but ultimately next to no rush up top. Very flat.
The difference is remarkable and a bit unsettling if you're not planning for it.
The V&H Mega I thought was made to combat the flatspot "can" headers have.
I know I don't do alot of topend hi rev riding on the street so I like the pipe. I would be interested to know the dyno numbers on two pipes since from '86 on the pipes are all smaller down pipes. For the gsxrs anyway.
I would question the "MASSIVE RUSH" which is why a dyno run would be good. I don't know of any gains like that from a pipe alone but could be wrong. The dyno runs on my kats are in the low to mid 130's hp and are anything but flat between 7 and 10k. I can't imagine bolting on a different header and experiencing a massive increase from what is there now.
Of course this is just my opinion. No numbers to back it up.
I was talking to a header guy recently and he was telling me the 4-1 pipe creates a scavenging effect sucking exhaust through the pipe where as the 4-2-1 does not. Anyone heard of that?