• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

synch then tune?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 82Shafty
  • Start date Start date
8

82Shafty

Guest
ok, I did not disassmble the quartet of carbs and they are still factory set as far as synch.

I did a bench rebuild and the carbs were very clean inside not warranting a further disassembly. I did remove the EPA caps and remove the idle screws for a proper cleaning.

Should I attempt to adjust the the fuel mixture screws with the 4 vacuum gauges and use the old school method for vacuum setting carbs for that sweat dial in:Adj to highest vacuum then richen a tad?

Bike currently idles great , revs great, but when riding it has the slightest stumble from about 2-4g rpm

I was looking for some advice before I dropped 60 bucks on the vacuum quartet.

bike just turned 9700 miles and I have not adjust valve clearance yet, but for the sake of this story, lets say they are in spec.
 
Actually, you'll get all the help you need here...and probably without the rudness...:-D

I'm fairly new here myself and these guys are great...

First...do a search on carb sync. You'll get lots of reading material. Then ask your questions....

You'll likely find out that there are choices in sync tools...
You'll also find out that the valves need to correctly adjusted to make it all worthwhile...

Personally, I'm going to order the one from England...forget the name right now. But it's not that expensive and a lot of people swear by it...
Of course I can use it, as I have three bikes to work on.

Later,
Bob T.
 
I am sure there are lots of nice riders on here and then there are those who like to call out the search button because that's what they know how to do.

Yes, I know how to use the search button and there are ten different topics that pop up all asking something in the same direction and all have the same answer. It's like reading a clymers manaul. I get tired of general questions or the same questions constantly popping up over an over again. It's still no reason to be ignorant. Perhaps it was my ignorance in not explaining what it was that I was truly after.

I know that you check the valves first... made a big difference on my 750F2 so I am saying that once you get past that point; I saw many posts that kind of tell you what you should be looking at.

http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showthread.php?t=97620&highlight=carb+synch

http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showthread.php?t=98077&highlight=carb+synch

http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/showthread.php?t=96763&highlight=carb+synch

I have been on message boards for about 10 years now and am not a noob by any means and I also wasn't looking for any sort of e-butt hurt.


Here's my reasoning:

If the vavles have been adjusted and I synch the carbs BUT the air/fuel ratio isn't correct, how the heck do you know that the synch is going to be correct beyond bench synching and then when you go to dial/synch with vacuum gauges or you think you have it, but then you go to adjust the air fuel ratio, unfortunately it won't be stoichiometric, which of course is not what you want at WOT, but cruising and anyways, I see a total chasing of the tail.

If I had an option to run a wide band on each cylinder to set the idle air/ fuel after bench synch, then synch, and possibly re-adjust idle air/fuel I wouldn't be on here asking. Reading plugs can get you awfully close but several attempts are made until it is truley set to most riders liking.

My concern is the percentage of error that could occur:

If the throttle blade, not the variable venturi is open a hair more than the others, but the fuel maybe compensating on that cylinder more than the others, beyond bench synching how is anyone really know that they are dead nuts on.

I am looking for a response from a senior member, one who perhaps has tuned a few bikes in his or her day and can vouch with real-world experience. Theories are great but I am asking for practice and not the practice that most of you may think that I am referring to, but the sorts of which would be considered medical termonology.

I have read about 9-10" of merc but still, do we take for granted that the air/fuel is appropriate before synch, then synch, the reset air/fuel?

If it is simply trial and error, then by all means then answer with just that.

Thank you for your time.
 
A successful sync of the carbuetor bank has little or nothing to do with each cylinders fuel mixture or cumbustion efficiency. What you are attempting to adjust and equalize between all carburetors is that the same volume of air is passing throgh the individual intake tracks as in every other carb on the bank at any given throttle position. This is by and far controlled by the opening of each throttle plate. Cylinder vacuum is not being measured. Air flow, venturi affect, produces a negative pressure on the each of the test gauges. By adjusting the throttle plate openings, you can pass the same volume of air through each carb by obtaining equal gauge settings among the gauges. Like one BIG carburetor, with one big throttle plate, providing all cylinder with an equal amount of air.

You can get close with a drill bit and a manual sync. However, that adjustment does not compensate for differances in carb bore, bore surface, throttle plate, shafts, or any other factor that can affect the actual air flow.

To adjust for equal air flow, you need to measure the air flow.
You could build a manifold hook to a powerful shop vac, mount your carburetors, (no fuel, no combustion, no heat, or vibration) and do a perfect job of synchronizing the bank. (labratory perfection)

Once the carbs are in sync, than you can adjust fuel mixture per each individual carburetor, feeling confident that each carb is passing an equal amount of air per given throttle opening. An old analog tachometer with an upper scale of 1500 rpm, would be a better, more sensative tool for adjusting fuel mixture at idle.

just a theory!
 
As in any theory Nert, it can be augmented.

I, in a mechanical engineering aspect, believe very strongly in a cause/effect relationship.

I am really fond of your air flow bench idea, been there with heads, never with carbs; Props to Nert!

Now, in order to achieve the pull/vacuum in the intake track which is the direct effect of the piston traveling down in the cylinder, air rushes over the venture creating a low pressure area in the throat and because atmospheric pressure is inside the bowl that then in turn strives to meet balance and pushes fuel up the idle circuit where it is atomized (boiled due to low pressure) into the air stream. This has been proven; not my theory and therefore is a fact.

So when you told me that I am not measuring cylinder vacuum, well actually I am because if it were not for that cylinder vacuum in the intake runner, I would not be able to measure the air being pulled (due to the vacuum) through the carb.

I think what we do have is a given percentage of what I like to call fluff.

Let?s say that I ran with the flow bench idea and set the carbs dead nuts on CFM wise at 28? of merc. Great! Well but that excludes all real world factors such as all cylinders may not pull the exact same volume?should in theory, but not always true in the real world. Granted the leak down is performed and comes back less than 5% (more accurate than compression testing.) Then this also accounts for the induction of atomized fuel in which, as you mentioned before, there could be tolerance issues in the carbs? bores so even if I have them exact (dry air run), when fuel is entered it may not swirl exactly the same and therefore decreasing the combustion efficiency which leads to more guessing. This doesn?t even account for runner length being tuned. I suppose this is why they went to fuel injection measuring crank speed to adjust for any inconsistencies.

I suppose that the situation truly is what it is and it is a method of constant fine tuning in order to achieve the median throughout the operating range.

I suppose the best method would be to air flow the carbs to precisely synch them, use fuel to compensate for any inconsistencies, achieve maximum rpm per given throttle opening, then slightly richen the mixture to keep the air cooled four happy.

Funny thing is the Clymer manual says to set 2&3 a tad more open on the t-blades by what is shown on the manometer.

Hmm now to build the flow bench.


Thanks for the idea Nert. Perhaps in the dead of winter I will have some leisure time to try this out.

BTW I am not trying to argue anyone, just trying to figure out the best (most accurate method) for all riders to dial these old girls in.
 
I've had my mixture screw settings all over the place and it hasn't affected my synch much if at all in my experience.

As previously stated, valve clearance is important so that the valves are opening and closing properly. Assumed is adaquate compression, that you don't have vaccum leaks and your air box is hooked up. Assumed also is that your vacuum line to the carbs is plugged.

Set mixture screws to a reasonably close setting....then synch (to whatever rpm you prefer, I use about 3,000 rpm....then finish it off. Highest idle on air screws etc. Having a couple of good fans is critical.

Its possible I guess but I've never heard of using a sych tool to adjust mixture or air screws. I've certainly never needed to, and adjustments I've made post-synch have not affected synchronization at all.

You're right on the slightly different setting between 1-4, and 2-3 on your model as you manual describes.

Most people here use a Motion Pro synchronizer. I use vacuum guages.
 
Ahhhh
perfect, you are trapped in the same quagmire i have been in for years.
I agree with all you say. Even downstream mechanics (dent in exhaust pipe, carbon, etc) can affect inlet flow as well. Synchronizing the carbs to an engine with something less than (4) perfectly matched, performing air pumps can only compromise maximum performance. Thus, the vacuum bench idea for the carburetor. Each component needs to be operating to max capacity and equal to same components for maximum performance.

I read on this forum the difference in reading for cylinders 2&3 and 1&4 is required due to air inlet air box effects. (have not formed an opinion myself)

I also find that adjusting sync at lower RPM is more accurate as the percentage of difference for a smaller throttle opening, becomes less as the throttle area opens.

Some what like how a drop of water affects a tea spoon of water, compared to how a drop of water affects a cup of water. The drop being the sync error or difference, the tea spoon being a small throttle opening, and cup being a large throttle opening. Fine tune the drop to the teaspoon, and the cup will notice even less that difference.
 
It's madness I tell ya. Sheer madness! So many barely measurable factors to consider for those anal at heart, and nothing but a calibrated ear to rely on.

I am too spoiled with having a piggy back and data logger on my Mustang.

Trace the wide band, look at where you want the a/f ratio to be throughout the range and what given tps angle/maf volt and go into that cell and change the ratio.

This 4 carb synching and tuining is the equivalent of taking my calculator away and making me utilize pythagoras's theorem. Hey what's only 64 proof's? Doable yes, favorable; depends on my mood.

Nert.. BTW I thought your idea with the cotters was pretty crafty in regards to synching. I was especially fond of the don't do's because I could very easily see some peoples attempting some pretty interesting angles.
 
Throw away your caculator and try this for the fuel air ratio
http://www.carbtune.com/colortune.html
I personally don't own one but I don't think I'm as into detail as you. The difference between the inner and outer cylinders are the inner run hotter because they don't have outer cooling fins. I sync with a mercury manometer and my bike runs great. I might be able to gain a nanosecond with mathematical perfection but I'm very happy with the way it runs. Well, least until I but my 1166 kit in my bike. Faster faster faster:)
 
I've tuned and re-jetted a lot of these old bikes over the years. I don't try to get too scientific about it. Hurts the head.
I believe in checking/adjusting all the basics first, such as compression, valve clearances, ignition timing/spark quality, clean parts throughout...only after I KNOW the bike is ready for carb work do I tune/re-jet the carbs. This may seem like more work to some but it saves time and frustration down the road.
I then bench synch as best I can, start the bike, warm up completely and set the mixture or separate air/fuel screws for best idle using 1,000 rpm's (or factory recommended idle rpm) as a base idle, vacuum synch at approx' 3,000 rpm's, double check the vacuum synch, then double check the mixture or air/fuel screw adjustments and fine tune if necessary. Works for me.
 
I just do as Suzuki's manual says to do and my bike is Veerrry happy!!!!
 
I've tuned and re-jetted a lot of these old bikes over the years. I don't try to get too scientific about it. Hurts the head.
I believe in checking/adjusting all the basics first, such as compression, valve clearances, ignition timing/spark quality, clean parts throughout...only after I KNOW the bike is ready for carb work do I tune/re-jet the carbs. This may seem like more work to some but it saves time and frustration down the road.
I then bench synch as best I can, start the bike, warm up completely and set the mixture or separate air/fuel screws for best idle using 1,000 rpm's (or factory recommended idle rpm) as a base idle, vacuum synch at approx' 3,000 rpm's, double check the vacuum synch, then double check the mixture or air/fuel screw adjustments and fine tune if necessary. Works for me.

I just do as Suzuki's manual says to do and my bike is Veerrry happy!!!!
My two teachers:-D :-D \\:D/
 
Well I synch'd the carbs today @ 1100 rpm with a vacuum gauge set I bought off of ebay.

Set the inners to 9 and the outter to a hair over 10"

When you set the carbs to the merc meter such as the Clymer's manual shows, what equivalent is that in " of merc on a Vacuum gauge? The drawing is very nebulous.


I believe, many years ago, this bike was cold blooded and took a good 5 mins to get up to operating temps. Once you ride the old girl for about 5 mins it runs great but anything before those 5 mins and it falls all over itself.

I have the mixture set to 2.5 out is where it idles the best; bike is stone stock.

Like I said that once the bike is FULLY hot, it revs happy and runs awesome, but it's like a bear coming out of hibernation when I first fire it up.
 
These bikes are cold natured. If your having problems when it is cold maybe your choke circuits are not working in the carbs. These are real small passages that richen the mixture when the choke is pulled on. They introduce fuel near the butterfly valves.

But the GS does take a while to warm up. On a cold day I can drive 5 miles before it behaves itself. Worth the wait!
 
12qwew
When you set the carbs to the merc meter such as the Clymer's manual shows, what equivalent is that in " of merc on a Vacuum gauge? The drawing is very nebulous.
10 in vacuum =25.4cm of Hg is that what you need to know?
 
I was curious about the equivalent of the gauge vs the manometer.

The book shows a line going through the manometer and how you are supposed to set the levels according to that, but I was trying to figure out how high the bar is placed, the measurement; the standard.

Perhaps the line is imaginary and it only used to show the relationship between the four cylinders. Subjective in a sense that every bike is a little different but as long as you set the relations accordingly, you will be ok.
 
As the saying goes: Don't make a science project out of this.

THe idea is to get the carbs balanced, not pulling a specific value. The relationship between them is what is important.
 
As previously stated, these bikes are known for wanting to be warmed up. Since you are located north, may be more obvious to you. Have you determined if your choke is working properly on all (4) carbs?

I run my GS1100 even when its cold out, 30'-32' (when i am desperate to ride). I always start full choke on (no throttle) it starts immediately then i just move the choke for steady run keeping rpm below 2k. After a minute or so waiting for stable idle of about 1200, (still partial choke) i begin to drive away. I use partial choke for the first .75 to 1 mile range (under 30 mph), at which point i begin a steady 50 mph cruise (turn choke completely off) for a total of 3.5 miles, seems pretty warmed up now. At which point i think my bike runs better 30' to 70' ambient air, cool air and all than it does in lets say 90' weather, especially after many miles.

Totally warmed idle for me is 950. Its smooth, regular, and reduces the "clunk" when shifting from neutral to first. I have no reason to idle at 1000 to 1100 which others seem to prefer.

I don't use a vacuum gauge set I use the Morgan Sync tool. (very nice) Does the vacuum gauge set provide away of syncing the gauges?
I don?t believe the numbers are all that import in terms of what they represent or how much. I think they have to be set equal or relative as indicated I do NOT use the idle screw to elevate the idle speed when performing a sync. I prefer to use a lovely Vanna type assistant to hold throttle, because that is how the carb bank is operated. The idle screw will actually torque the linkage ever so slightly to provide a slightly different reading. (and as you and I discussed earlier, it is about trying to eliminate error with precision) I like to ?blip? the throttle between adjustments as well, again to naturalize all the linkage and connections between the carbs, and then continue syncing until I am satisfied. I will check at various RPM as well. My Nert carb Sync screw modification does make this a much easier task. I also made nice little curved tubing extensions that remain fitted to the vacuum ports for easy hook up of sync tool. (careful to keep length of extensions equal or length of all 4 hoses connected to extensions equal)

One other item that made a significant difference in good solid performance is correct and equal, fuel bowl level. I find that due to diff in float weight, tension, valve and seats, etc, manual setting are only just ?good enough?. The clear fuel line method (boiler tube) as described in the OE books looks very good. I built a fuel bowl (from a spare) with a clear window and target scribe mark, indicating the correct fuel level. Then on a bench, leveled for and aft, side to side, I run fuel to the carbs, from an elevated tank, check the fuel level for each carb and adjust as needed. It?s a time consuming process. Each fuel bowl needs to be drained, removed, adjusted, installed and refilled many times to get all four carbs equal. (very anal).

IN theory, I should be able to connect a fuel manifold across all (4) fuel bowls allowing all bowls to naturally ?seek? their own level equally relative to the highest set fuel float.
Only potential problem I can think of is, what effects, when the bike is put on a side stand or steep angled cornering. Don?t have the time to find out!!


And I just love ?stone stock?.
 
Well, as I continue to search for perfection I keep finding another reason to spend more money LOL.

Nert, I am not sure if you want to kick me in the shin now or later but I finally read an article on the intake o-rings.

Like I said before, when this bike is fully hot, she runs great to the point of you better hold on or your coming off, but anything before that and its coughin and spitting and won't rev after a couple mins with the choke.

It will fire right up and run great with the choke on but don't try to rev it. It's about 80 degrees and it takes a good 15 minutes to warm up. My theory is that the crummy little o-rings swell enough and with the bike being hot enough the lean mixture works after the 15 mins. I did spray around the intake boots but not the o-ring area. I am going to try that tonight with the bike is cold and see if I can get it to respond.

If so then it's back off with the carbs and a re-synch and tune. Shoot only it takes about 15 minutes to remove tank, airbox, and carbs and that's because I am being as careful as I can with those parts.
 
I hear ya. Still gotta do it myself.

Depnding upon what you where spraying, just being in the area of the carburetor boots oftens affects a differance when the o-rings are leaking.

The worn o-rings are associated with an erratic idle, and one that is slow to return to idle speed when the throttle is closed as well. I usually change them every couple years.

keep at it. report progress and clues.

vic
 
Back
Top