• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Valve wear advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter rputney01
  • Start date Start date
R

rputney01

Guest
I pulled the head and checked the valves and springs against the specs in the manual. The springs and exhaust valves are well above the service limit. The intake valves are right at or just barely above the service limit. Should I replace all the valves, just the intake valves or none of the above? This bike won't get a lot of miles put on it, so I don't want to spend money I don't need to. On the other hand, I don't want to create problems down the road by saving a buck right now. If I'm going to bite the bullet and buy valves, should I go with the stock Suzuki valves or upgrade to APE stainless steel?

Your thoughts and opinions are invited. Thanks.
 
What are you measuring? Valve stem diameter or ?
 
rputney01 said:
Yes. The valves are all slightly enlongated, but the diameters are barely above the service limit.
Click to expand...

I've never heard of valves elongating. That's a new one on me. Can't see a spec in the service manual either. Please explain.

With the valve stem diameter at the service limit, the valve to valve guide clearance will almost certainly be over the limit. To measure valve stem to guide clearance you need to do the "wobble test", the service manual shows how and the spec is .004" or less. Interestingly, there is some conflicting information regarding the valve stem to guide clearance service limit between the various Suzuki service manuals. For example, in the original GS850 manual the maximum clearance is listed as .004", just like the original 1000 manual, but in the later year manual supplements the spec allows .014" clearance, which is HUGE. My opinion is that this later spec is way too much, so I stick to the original number.
 
Last edited:
Nessism said:
I've never heard of valves elongating. That's a new one on me. Can't see a spec in the service manual either. Please explain.

Maybe stretching or lengthening would be more accurate. In short, the old ones are longer than the new ones, which makes sense I guess. That is why the shims are different thicknesses. I didn't see anything in the manual either. I just compared a new one to an old one.

Pics:

New

2011-05-26093528.jpg


Old

2011-05-26093436.jpg


Diameter - Service limit is 6.90

2011-05-26093918.jpg


Finally, the buckets show wear as well. Does this mean they need replacing also?

2011-05-26094052.jpg


I did the wobble test and there is some movement, but not a lot. I'll do more checking. Thanks for the advice Ed.
Click to expand...
 
If I may interject my two cents into this.

the stem on that valve looks just fine. you said the valves appear to have very little wobble but you haven't measured it yet. I think you'll be just fine re-using them if the wobble measures okay.

you'll need to use a good Micrometer to measure the stems instead of those calipers you are measuring with. it's the calibration of the calipers I'd be concerned with, not the valve stem diameter. how much over discard did the new stem measure?
 
Yea, as Dale says, you need a good micrometer to measure the valve stems, one that measures in .0001" increments. To measure the wobble you need a good dial indicator. It's a little tricky to get the indicator in the proper position so have fun with that.

So going back to the true service limit for valve stem to guide clearance, after noticing the later manual supplements allow such a wide clearance I checked some other service manuals and I can't find any others that allow as much. So based on what other manufactures allow, and the early manual numbers, I recommend sticking to .004" or .005". More might be okay, but I like my valves tight!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top