F
flyingace
Guest
They dont sound rediculously low to me, and they're well above service limits. Remember that pistons are generally NOT exactly the same size, and thats part of the reason the rings are springy to begin with. At any rate, I do have a concern, and it may be way off, but I THOUGHT that i remembered reading in my various manuals that if the cylinders were a certain percentage apart from eachother in compression, that there may be a problem. Im not possitive, but you may want to check that out. While they are all above service limits, they may be bellow the required compression in relation to eachother. This sort of makes sense to me in my head, as if your cylinders compression is alot higher on one or more than another or more, the crank may be loaded unevenly, resulting in issues. Plus the cylinders may load up to the point where it seems to lope when it hits a low cylinder vs a high one. In which case you may have a cylinder wall issue, or a valve seating issue? Im not sure again, so you might want to investigate that theory.
TCK
The Haynes manual has something like compression between 120-170 with no more than a 28 PSI difference between high and low.
Just to clarify, my rings are new but a complete ring job was not done. I mixed/matched pistons from this and another bike until I got within spec. Then roughed up the cylinders and installed $25 EBay rings. That represents the total cost - $25. I think the readings are pretty respectable after 15K miles considering the shade tree factor.