• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

  • In order to help others find info on a particular bike, be sure to put the year, make or model of bike that you are asking a question about, in the Topic Title. This will allow people to pass by posts they have no interest in.

Are V-Rods a pariah?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brownford
  • Start date Start date
HD XLCR. Very desirable for some collectors.
Me, i'd like to have an XR750 ;)

I can't believe I compimented the looks of a cafe racer. At least it doesn't have the cheesy ironing-board-with-a-lump-in-the-back seat on it.
 
The V-Rod is generally not considered a 'real' Harley by the masses, but I like it okay. The styling is fine, but for me even though the motor isn't a world beater by modern standards it IS a good strong well designed modern power plant with plenty of untapped potential. If they would put that motor in a more sporty chassis I'd REALLY be interested. Maybe not interested enough to buy one, but I'd really like to see them go beyond their traditional customer base, I don't see why they can't. At very least I'd like to see SOME American company do it but we're a bit funny about such things here apparently.
 
xlcr-1977.jpg


I'd still go for this over the V ROD

My Dad rode Harleys for years and had one of those brand new, he said it wasn't very good.

Now this is a v-twin Buell I want :D

1190rs_spec.png


183006_1816350285087_1130000357_2074103_5001309_n.jpg
 
A friend of mine rides a V-Rod. I emailed her, asked her if it was her first bike, whether she'd ridden other ones, and how she'd decided on the V-Rod.

She took HD's MSF course, by the way, to get her license. Somewhere around 2007, maybe 2006. Bought the V-Rod in early 2007.

Her response:
My first bike was a hd sportster 883Low. Decided I wanted a bigger bike, liked the paint set on the vrod I have and the rest is history. I did not ride anything else. The vrod is nicely balanced and easy to handle and it loooooves the curves!!
8029549426_5c9c6313ab_o.jpg
 
My Dad rode Harleys for years and had one of those brand new, he said it wasn't very good.

Your dad was right. Beautiful looking, but it wasn't a good period for Harley. Several years ago, I went on the Crud Run with a friend's '78 MG Lemans. Really nice ride and okay for 200 miles. He was going to ride his brother's sweet restored XLCR, but it caught fire in the driveway. He took his Z1R instead.
 
I would own a V-Max if I could find a decent early one in good condition that was cheap...

I like the engine on the V-Rod, but not much else. I've never ridden one, and doubt I ever will - it's just not the style of bike I like.

I'm not against HD, but their various models, and certainly their pricing, are not for me. About the only HD I would buy is an old flat-head - I just like the looks of the old 45 CI motors.
 
I read about a V-rod that has controls in the normal place. I don't understand why people need to feel like they are in an easy chair when riding. I guess with open headers and the pirate uniform you dont have to worry about not being seen:rolleyes:
The new V-Max, now THERE is a bike that would not need to be hot rodded by anyone except unbalanced people:cool: 200 hp 1600+ cc? Its not the look that is attractive to me its the uber power, it is a bit fugly to me but still an attractive bike.
BUT, I'd take a 1500cc GS inline 4 anyday instead:cool:
 
I rode a V-Rod muscle at the test ride event last year. It was a very nice bike. Saying you could get XXX for half the price that would spank it in the quarter/twisties/light to light etc. is missing the whole point of the machine. It's a bike for those who want a real Harley but aren't averse to owning something a bit more modern; a hog without the 1%er baggage so to speak. I rode a 1200 Sportster deluxe after it, and it was also a very neat bike in it's own way. I'm sorely tempted to pick up a 1200 Roadster or 883R and 1200cc the motor.

The 750/500 Street will probably be derided also. I'm wanting to take one out this year to see how it goes. My test rides last year improved my impression of the brand immensely.
 
HD did a VRod in a sporting format a few years back. I really liked that bike. The only VRod I've ridden personally was one of the original all silver dealies. Nice in a straight line and sounded good with aftermarket pipes (not like the usual HD ear-rape), but sloppy around turns. Brakes were decent, though.
 
Harley Davidson Turning gasoline into obnoxious noise without the harmful effects of horse power since 1903
 
Porsche helped mitigate against that for the MoCo in the case of the VRod. HD couldn't manage it on their own.
 
The new V-Max, now THERE is a bike that would not need to be hot rodded by anyone except unbalanced people:cool: 200 hp 1600+ cc? Its not the look that is attractive to me its the uber power, it is a bit fugly to me but still an attractive bike.
BUT, I'd take a 1500cc GS inline 4 anyday instead:cool:

I guess I am unbalanced because a V max is a pig it weighs a ton and with a really good rider it only went a 10.13 that is only .5 second faster than the original
 
I guess I am unbalanced because a V max is a pig it weighs a ton and with a really good rider it only went a 10.13 that is only .5 second faster than the original

You can't really go by any of the numbers posted, stock vs stock, the new VMAX is at least a second faster in the quarter mile than the 1st generation, which doesn't sound like much, but LOOKS much more impressive on a drag strip! The new VMAX is heavy though, that's it's biggest problem. 200 HP but way over 700 lbs, my B-King is 175 horses but weighs 200 lbs less, HP to weight ratio is the key. The VROD was just Harleys failed attempt to make a bike that was somewhat fast on the street, but it couldn't even beat a 30 year old Japanese muscle bike! To make matters worse, they are outcasts in their own riding groups, the hardcore Harley guys hate them with a passion! FAIL!
 
You can't really go by any of the numbers posted, stock vs stock, the new VMAX is at least a second faster in the quarter mile than the 1st generation, which doesn't sound like much, but LOOKS much more impressive on a drag strip! The new VMAX is heavy though, that's it's biggest problem. 200 HP but way over 700 lbs, my B-King is 175 horses but weighs 200 lbs less, HP to weight ratio is the key. The VROD was just Harleys failed attempt to make a bike that was somewhat fast on the street, but it couldn't even beat a 30 year old Japanese muscle bike! To make matters worse, they are outcasts in their own riding groups, the hardcore Harley guys hate them with a passion! FAIL!

The #'s I posted where from the original test with Dale riding so same guy riding both bikes 1st gen 10.68 2nd gen 10.13 same track just over 20 years later. He did both original testing for Yamaha. Now pee wee or Jay went a 10.33 on the 1 st gen but never tested the 2 gen and no one has ever beaten his time on a stock Vmax. Now Dale has modified a 2nd gen extensively and got it deep into the low 9's but at a high $$ cost and the Vmax already cost a bundle
 
Back
Top