• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Differences between VM26 carbs for GS850 and GS1000 engines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bgk
  • Start date Start date
B

bgk

Guest
I have a 1979 GS1000L. Some time ago, I traded parts with a fellow GS Resources member and I obtained a spare set of VM26 carbs that came off a 1979 GS850G.

Another fellow GS Resource member is currently rebuilding and rejetting the spare set of carbs for me. The rebuild project includes a Dynojet Stage 3 kit for my 4 into 1 pipe and individual K&N pod filters (Dynojet part 3304), plus all new gaskets and float valve assembly (K&L) and new O-rings (Robert Barr).

My bike is in Massachusetts. The spare set of carbs is in California. It?s a real pain in the ass to walk back and forth to compare between the two!

The question is:

What, if any, differences are there between the stock VM 26 carbs for the 1979 850 and 1000 engines that I need to worry about (other than the stuff that will get replaced with the Dynojet, K&L, and Robert Barr kits)?

Can somebody possibly with experience with VM26 carb applications for both GS850 and GS1000 engines post back to me on this?

Failing that, can anybody with a factory manual for a 1979 GS850 post the carb specs from the manual, so I can compare them to the carb specs in my GS1000 manual?

Finally, anybody have a spare ?T? fitting from the fuel line into the carbs that you?d be willing to sell me? It?s a metal ?T? with rubber coating on the ends. My ?T? fitting is a little loose and I?m worried it might leak fuel some day in the future.

Thanks.
 
Re: Differences between VM26 carbs for GS850 and GS1000 engi

Re: Differences between VM26 carbs for GS850 and GS1000 engi

Brion, as far as I know, all GS 1000's up to and including 1979 used VM 28
carbs........not 26's.

Earl






bgk said:
I have a 1979 GS1000L. Some time ago, I traded parts with a fellow GS Resources member and I obtained a spare set of VM26 carbs that came off a 1979 GS850G.

Another fellow GS Resource member is currently rebuilding and rejetting the spare set of carbs for me. The rebuild project includes a Dynojet Stage 3 kit for my 4 into 1 pipe and individual K&N pod filters (Dynojet part 3304), plus all new gaskets and float valve assembly (K&L) and new O-rings (Robert Barr).

My bike is in Massachusetts. The spare set of carbs is in California. It?s a real pain in the ass to walk back and forth to compare between the two!

The question is:

What, if any, differences are there between the stock VM 26 carbs for the 1979 850 and 1000 engines that I need to worry about (other than the stuff that will get replaced with the Dynojet, K&L, and Robert Barr kits)?

Can somebody possibly with experience with VM26 carb applications for both GS850 and GS1000 engines post back to me on this?

Failing that, can anybody with a factory manual for a 1979 GS850 post the carb specs from the manual, so I can compare them to the carb specs in my GS1000 manual?

Finally, anybody have a spare ?T? fitting from the fuel line into the carbs that you?d be willing to sell me? It?s a metal ?T? with rubber coating on the ends. My ?T? fitting is a little loose and I?m worried it might leak fuel some day in the future.

Thanks.
 
Not so you guys. In the U.S. at least, only 26mm were installed. I believe Australia or other countries had 28mm installed.
 
MY BOOK GS1000E lists the carbs AS 26mm for the GS1000 and 850 Other than a main jet difference they are the same, if you are installing a jet kit It doesn't matter The 850 is jetted richer than the 1000
 
SqDancerLynn1 said:
MY BOOK GS1000E lists the carbs AS 26mm for the GS1000 and 850 Other than a main jet difference they are the same, if you are installing a jet kit It doesn't matter The 850 is jetted richer than the 1000
Lynn, just curious. If you have the carb spec's for both the 850 and 1000, are you saying the only difference you see is the main jet? So, in particular, the air jet and needle jet are identical? That's needle jet, not jet needle.
I have the 1000 factory manual spec's but not any technical 850 info. Thanks!
 
This is getting a bit strange. I have recently rebuilt and tuned two GS1000 carb sets. One was a 78 E model and the other was a 77 L model. Both had 28 mm VM carbs.

Earl


SqDancerLynn1 said:
MY BOOK GS1000E lists the carbs AS 26mm for the GS1000 and 850 Other than a main jet difference they are the same, if you are installing a jet kit It doesn't matter The 850 is jetted richer than the 1000
 
77GS750 NEVER came with 28mm
The info I have shows VM 26mm
GS1000 main jet #95 Needle jet 0-4 Jet needle 5DL36-3
GS850 #102.5 0-6 5DL36-2


The 26mm were sometimes bored out to 28mm and modified
 
Lynn, thanks for the info.
Earl, they did'nt make a 1000 in '77. I don't know how things happen, but I'm positive about the U.S. bikes only getting 26mm carbs. That's what every factory manual I've seen says too. Also the Suzuki dealers. I've heard from a couple of members here that Australia and possibly other countries had 28mm carbs.
I'm the one who's working on BGK's carbs. He said they're off a '79 850. They look identical to my '79 1000's. In fact, they even have the same #95 stock mains and the needle clip in #3 groove which contradicts Lynn's info. Of course, someone could have changed them. That does'nt bother me because the mains/needles are being replaced anyway. What bothers me is if these really are 850 carbs, then according to Lynn's info the needle jets are a different size. I can't see any size stamped on them, but they look identical, same # of tiny holes and everything. I'm going to have to just hope that the needle jets are also actually 0-4 (1000) and not 0-6 (850). I don't need more jetting questions. I'm wondering if Brion was given bad info and these are in fact off a 1000.
My biggest problem right now is his fuel "T" for the fuel line. These carbs have a metal "T" with a thin rubber coating over the ends that slip into the carb fuel inlets. The rubber ends have "built in" o-rings. His is loose and after I finished his carbs I tested them and sure enough, it leaks. The part is not sold anymore and my only salvage yard does'nt have a good one. I guess the rubber shrank a little from non-use, I don't know. The rubber feels fine. I had one spare but it actually fits even worse. So we're dead in the water until we can find one that fits tighter. Very frustrating.
Just wondering, has it been your experience that after the rubber is exposed to gas for a while, that maybe the rubber will expand some?
 
About that 'T' fitting: Some of these carbs use all metal tubes which have grooves for O-rings. For these, there's no problem, as my kits include these O-rings. (12 total). I've had trouble trying to narrow down which years had which fuel tubes.

If you can hunt down one of these all-metal 'T's, I'd bet that they'd replace the rubberized type (with new O-rings installed, of course), presuming that the inlet bore diameters would be the same between the years. Maybe you can pull up an exploded diagram at a dealership or elsewhere, but I just can't see a manufacturer re-tool for a different diameter of inlet bore for the exact same function on the same carb. They'd have to re-cast each carb, and that costs $$$.
 
Thanks guys,

Yesterday, I posted on the Parts Wanted forum, looking for a replacement "T" fitting. No responses yet. I called a motorcycle salvage yard today. No luck there either. I'll keep looking and phoning.

In the meantime, I've got a dumb question:

Could Keith simply use the Robert Barr O-rings in the "T" fitting I've already got, kinda like a "press fit"?

Once the "T" fitting is installed, it doesn't move, right?
 
I've had good luck taking things like that to the local hydraulic repair shop and they have always had "O" rings that would fit whatever I happened to be struggling with. :-)

Earl

bgk said:
Could Keith simply use the Robert Barr O-rings in the "T" fitting I've already got, kinda like a "press fit"?

Once the "T" fitting is installed, it doesn't move, right?
 
Hey, hey, hey!

I just checked out the link to motorcyclecarbs.com that Robert provided.

The part number for the "T" fitting (part #8 in the diagram) is VM26 / 268.

Seems logical it would be for a VM 26 carb, even if the parts diagram and list is for a VM 29.

Unless you guys tell me otherwise, I'll order the "T" tomorrow and have it sent direct to Keith.
 
Brion, it took me 1.8 seconds to try using the o-rings over the existing fitting. They just roll out as you slip the "T" in. The o-rings appear to be a good fit but after you stretch them over the already rubber coated fitting, they are too big. You would'nt want a stretched o-ring in service anyway.
I think the other style of "T" with the replaceable o-rings is an upgrade. The thinner rubber coating with the raised ribs just is'nt going to consistently last unless it's in a certain environment. That's why the used ones all seem to be different diameters. Some have been in better conditions/temps' than others. Most of them, regardless of conditions, seal OK IF LEFT UNDISTURBED.
I just checked out the site from Robert. I too, would have to believe the 29's "T" would work. I would guess that Robert's o-rings in your kit would be the same too and you would'nt need to also buy the 29's o-rings, but that's just a guess. The two different styles of "T" should not vary except for the how they designed the rubber ends. Where I could see the potential for difference is in the width of the "T". I just measured it and the total width from rubber end to rubber end is just over 2 1/4". The width of just the metal body is 1 1/4". Those replacements measurements would have to be the same with just a little smaller still OK, but any wider would'nt fit unless it was very little. I could'nt figure out their site to see prices. If they're cheap, maybe it would be a good idea to just get the "T" with it's 4 o-rings? You need to e-mail them about the width first.
I'll be buying one too for future purposes if it's right.
 
Robert, Thank you very much for your reply and turning us on to that website. :D Regardless if the "T" will work or not, I appreciate the effort you made. I have a feeling it will work as long as the total width of the "T" is close.
I've done a lot of carb work and this is about the most trouble I've had with a little part. What a feeling to do a good rebuild job and then test and see gas come out of that little $@#!&%. It's a lot of work to swap the part and you have to re-synch, etc. Getting tougher and tougher to live with these old bikes.
If Brion contacts them and the "T" will work, I just want you to know how happy you've made two people. The last few days have not been fun. But how else do we learn I guess?
You asked for any of us who use your kits to give a review of your o-ring kits and I'll post a review soon. I should do it in the "Products Review" section I think so more members will notice.
 
I will have to check BS carb fitting to see if it can be reto If you are carefull I would think you could cut enough out of the old fitting to make a grouve for the O rings
 
Yup, I've thought of that too. Might be some trial and error to it, but certainly possible. Now that Roberts showed us that parts source, I'll be on pins and needles 'til Brion contacts me.
To quote that saying in "The Shawshank Redemption"..."Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things".
 
Maybe we should get a group buy :lol: If someone had a lathe I would bet they could make a brass one without too much trouble! The later style BS carb fuel fitting will NOT fit
 
Guys

Assuming the part works, how many of you want a spare "T" fitting?

I'll certainly buy at least two, one for me and one for Keith to have as a back-up. It's the least I can do, given the hassle he's gone through with my carbs.

Earl, Lynn, Robert, how 'bout you? You guys have been good to me. Unless the part is outrageously priced, it'll be my treat at the "T" fitting ice cream stand! All part of the GSR spirit.

Also, Keith, the guy I got the carbs from had a GS850 and had a spare set of carbs for his bike. Who knows, maybe his spare set you're working on actually did come off a GS1000. With bikes this old, and lots of scavenging from parts bikes, no wonder there's so much confusion.
 
Back
Top