• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

GS450 Low Compression after rebuild

  • Thread starter Thread starter JRHemmen
  • Start date Start date
Phew. Glad it isn't something more serious. When I put the chain tensioner back in, we didn't loosten any bolt, I turned the spring fully counter clockwise allowing the plunger to depress and held the spring out until it was bolted into the engine. Is this acceptable, or do I need to redo it? Also, what would cause the choke to be stuck? I did a full carb clean and installed new jets and O rings as well. Do I need to take it apart and spray out the passages again?

Thanks again to everyone for the tremendous amount of help you've been. I'm looking forward to the day where I'll be of some benefit to others on the forum once I know more about these bikes.
 
You need to understand how this works. The screw holds the plunger back so you can install it. Holding the spring all the way back does the same thing. For the tensioner to work the screw needs to be loose, and locked in the loose position. If you could move the plunger easily it sounds like it's in the proper unlocked position, but I'd still check it to make sure. You certainly did it the hard way.
 
That certainly seems to be how I go about things, haha. I read through the first 60 pages of the manual tonight and I already have a much better understanding than I did 24 hours ago. Is it possible that a spark leak could cause my backfire? I'm not sure what the proper terminology is, but if my spark plug boots are in pretty bad shape (easily pull right off coil wires), could there be some arc that causes a delay in ignition? I'm hesitant to think it's that since it was definitely a backfire through the carb, and not an after fire (out the tail pipe), but I don't want to rule it out just yet.
 
Going about things the hard way? Or just generally being un/misinformed? Sorry.
 
My new sealed rings arrived in the mail today, they're rusty. Is this okay? I'm hoping I can just sand the rust off?
 
I've used 1500 grit sandpaper on a really flat surface to knock the rusty spots down to level with the surface and not worried about it. Just make sure that the ring isn't tight in the groove.

I'm somewhat concerned that the rings may not be the right size. As I recall, the top ring is 2.6mm wide and the second ring is 3.0. There appears to be more than .4mm difference between these rings. Have you checked them against the originals? The thickness is 1.8mm for both as I recall.

The end gap - free -should be about 8 - 9mm and these top rings look to be more like 3mm. The top ring looks to be highly questionable to me.

If they are the same then disregard my comments.
 
John Park said:
I've used 1500 grit sandpaper on a really flat surface to knock the rusty spots down to level with the surface and not worried about it. Just make sure that the ring isn't tight in the groove.

I'm somewhat concerned that the rings may not be the right size. As I recall, the top ring is 2.6mm wide and the second ring is 3.0. There appears to be more than .4mm difference between these rings. Have you checked them against the originals? The thickness is 1.8mm for both as I recall.

The end gap - free -should be about 8 - 9mm and these top rings look to be more like 3mm. The top ring looks to be highly questionable to me.

If they are the same then disregard my comments.
Click to expand...

I haven't checked against originals, I haven't been home yet and I was hoping to leave the engine alone until I had my frame and electrical finished. I'll try the sandpaper method, thanks. I think the difference is just due to the camera on my phone, when I hold one over the other .6mm definitely seems like a plausible number for the size difference between the two. I'll check with calipers tonight.

They are P/N 12140-44110-100.
 
I bet that rust will come off with a rag and some oil or something, sanding shouldn't be necessary.
 
Those are 1mm over rings, cannot use those on stock bore cylinders and pistons
 
I assume that's what the -100 means on the part number? Do I need -000?
 
JRHemmen said:
I assume that's what the -100 means on the part number? Do I need -000?
Click to expand...

Now I see; the two thinner rings are the oil control and the other two are top and second. Without the spacer ring I wasn't thinking of them. However, the part number I see is 12140-44110 for standard rings. 12140-441100- 050 is .5mm oversize and 12140-44110-100 is 1mm oversize. While 000 may make sense, it's redundant; it's just a suffix.
 
Okay, thanks. I didn't include the spacer in the picture because it didn't have any corrosion on it. I'll return these and buy the right rings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

crazyramen
Low Compression in 3 Cylinders 100 Miles After Rebuild
Replies
16
Views
249
rphillips
R
S
Psyching myself up for the top end - any veteran eyes up to read borescope pictures?
Replies
16
Views
414
DimitriT
DimitriT
brit7.11
GS425 Oil Consumption. Problem?
Replies
14
Views
311
brit7.11
brit7.11
S
Grime in Valve Cover
2
Replies
35
Views
411
rphillips
R
chuck hahn
10 years after
Replies
18
Views
282
chuck hahn
chuck hahn
Back
Top