• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Hacking the harbor freight $5 charger

  • Thread starter Thread starter bakalorz
  • Start date Start date
B

bakalorz

Guest
There were a couple of threads about the Harbor Freight $5 chargers a
little while back.
I got one of the 42292 chargers myself a few weeks ago.

The first thing I noticed, was that the charge voltage was listed as 12.5 volts.
This is too low. A fully charged 12 volt battery will have a resting
voltage of 12.6 to 13 volts or so, depending on type, temp, and possibly
other factors. And you would want the float storage voltage to be a few
tenths above the resting voltage.

Fortunately, this appears to have been a typo; when I measured the
actual voltage with a digital multimeter it was 12.77
I still think this is too low too, but it is at least marginally
acceptable for some batteries. It is NOT high enough for Absorbed Glass
Mat (AGM) batteries though; on the box the charger is listed for only
flooded and maintenance free batteries.
Others reported higher voltages, up to 13.2 volts or so
So apparently QA in china is not quite up to par.

12.77 is marginally acceptable but it is not really enough either.
13.2 or so would be good. (thats what the battery tender is set at)
So, since it wasn't really as high as I would want and I like to
experiment, I took my charger appart. This was very easy to do, just
pry up on the plastic cover and it popped right out.

What I found was somewhat annoying. There were 2 resistors in series in
the spots marked R1 and VR1 (black and red arrows on fig1) Curiously
enough the spot marked VR1 had an unused third hole.
(by the time I took the picture for fig 1 I had already clipped out the
resistor at VR1)
The resistors were about 300 ohms at R1 and 50 ohms at VR1.

Clipping out VR1 and substituting various values for the series total
let me get output voltages of from 6.3 volts to 21.7 volts
For example: 220 ohms = 17 volts, 320 = 13.9, 380=12.6

Freaking bean counters ... What obviously happened is that VR1 was
designed to have been a pot to let the manufacturer set the output
accurately, but someone had decided that it was cheaper to just use a
plain resistor and hope the output was close enough. With the existing
R1 and a 100 ohm pot for VR1, the output could be adjusted from 12 to 14
volts or so.

So I looked in my junk box for a 100 ohm pot that would fit into the
existing holes.
Putting in a 100 Ohm pot would have made this into quite a nice little
charger for an extra 50 cents or so and 5 minutes of effort.
Unfortunately I didn't have any pots that were anywhere close to the
right value and had pins that would fit the little triangle.
I wasn't about to order a 50 cent pot and pay $5 shipping to fix it
either.

The closest I had was a physically MUCH bigger 15 turn pot at 200 ohms.
But looking at it, it would just barely fit on a diagonal and connect to
almost the right pads.
It needs to connect to the pad in the very bottom left of figs 2, 4, and
5. It couldn't quite reach if it was going to fit back in the
enclosure. So I moved it in slightly and soldered it to the wrong pad,
and then bent it over to the right pad, and tacked it down there.
I then took an xacto knife and cut a groove through the wrong pad to
isolate that part from the rest of the pad. See the arrow in fig 5.
The other pins in the pot were soldered to the rest of that pad
(compare figures 2 and 4)
I had to drill holes and scratch the green coating to solder them.

This would have given me an adjustment range of about 11 to 13.7 volts
or so. This would make it a fine float charger, useful for storing
batteries.
If I bumped up the high end a bit, it would make a charger which could
be set for either (semi)fast charging or float storage.
So I decided to also change R1 while I was at it. By making R1
equal to 220 ohms, the adjustment range changed to 12 through 17 volts
or so. Pretty much perfect.

I then drilled a hole in the case so I could access the pot with the
case sealed up (figs 6 and 7)

---

So what are my conclusions.
The harbor freight charger is a very reasonably priced little charger.
It is short circuit protected, and has an antispark circuit.
It is not diode isolated, and should not be left attached to a battery for very long if it is not plugged in.
If you get one which is at the right voltage for your application, it can effectively more or less replace a battery tender.
Unfortunately the voltage may be off from what you need, and not all of
them are the same either.
If you go to a local harbor freight, take a digital voltmeter along, and
plug in and check the output voltage of a couple of them until you find
one that is at the voltage you want, they will all be slightly different.

If you want to change one that you already have, there are 3 ways to go.
In order of increasing difficulty:

1) get a little 100 ohm pot with the leads in a triange that will fit
where the original one was supposed to go and solder it in.

2) replace R1 and VR1 with a series/parallel combination of resistors to
set the (non-adjustable) voltage you want. The holes are big enough to
easily fit the leads for 2 or 3 or 4 resistors in each one.
To increase the voltage, you want to reduce the resistance.
This is very easy to do by paralleling R1 or VR1 with other (probably
higher resistance) resistors. You can find out what you need easily.
Hook a voltmeter to the output clips and plug the charger in.
Then just touch various resistors to both sides of R1. I would start by
trying 1000 ohm, or 2200, or 3300, or 4700, or 6800, or 10,000

3) fit in a 100 ohm 15 turn pot.

For options 1 and 3 if you reduce R1 to 220 ohms and use a 200 ohm pot
you can get a wider adjustment range.
 
Continued (#2)

Forum would only allow 1 pic at a time, hence the multi posting
 
Last edited:
Nice contribution, but, jeez, why not just get a Battery Tender in the first place? I know a lot of people like to get cheap tools and improve them but I guess I am not one of them.

It does look like the engineer who designed the product intended for there to be a pot, but I am actually a little surprised at that. As you must know, resistors come with tolerances, usually 5% from what I remember, but if you use two in series you can trade the tolerances from one to the other. Evidently the mfr just didn't do a good job of that. Or maybe for the price the factory gets for one of these neither option leaves them a profit--remember there are a lot of middlemen and transportation costs etc. before it hits $5.
 
Cool - I have one of these under the bench that I tossed there when it proved totally ineffective for charging any batteries I had laying around.

I'll play around with it and maybe get it going well enough to keep some stuff charged.
 
I've got a harbor freight not too far from me, I'll be grabbing one or two of these the next time I get around to monkey with them!

Thanks for the info!
 
Nice contribution, but, jeez, why not just get a Battery Tender in the first place?
Well, with Bakaorz's expertise, I have no doubt that he might actually have a Battery Tender or its equivalent. :shock:

I, for one, appreciate his expertise and his willingness to play with a project like this. The Harbor Freight charger has been mentioned several times, and I have thought of getting one for myself, but I already have three of the Schumacher chargers, so there was no pressing need to get one right now.

Martin, thank you for taking the time to investigate the charger and report your findings.
Have you done anything yet to determine if if ever goes into a 'float' mode?


.
 
I only wish I had that type of knowledge...electronics are not my cup of tea. :? Now if you need to calculate the flow rate and volumetric efficiencies for a given engine / carb set-up...that I can do. :?
 
Just got your updated schematics of the reg\rect and I concur with what Steve wrote your willingness to tinker is a welcome addition to this site.

The fact that you can explain fairly complex notions like this charger to people like me who have marginal skills is amazing

Thanks for sharing
 
Thanks, Martin!

I have one of these sitting off to the side (I've since bought a very nice Vector Electronic Unit which does quite a lot of things nicely), after questionable performance from it. I'll look into "improving" it as well.

As for "complaining" about Harbor Freight products, I've had pretty good luck with them overall, and have found that carefully picking and choosing what I buy from them ensures a pretty decent result!

Regards,
 
Back
Top