Alright so I would like your opinions on this... Do any of you consider it necessary to run an inline fuel filter on a GS?
I have definitely pulled apart some carburetors and found very fine remnants of rust powder in the bottoms of the the bowls. But if you have ever pulled a petcock out of the fuel tank, they had originally a tall plastic frame with a filter mesh in it. This piece also serves as the facilitator of the reserve function on the fuel petcock. It has two different height inlets so that "on" draws from the higher portion, and "reserve" draws from the lowest portion off the bottom of the tank.
A few times I have found these plastic filter/reserve inserts for the petcocks have come loose and fallen out even (if you have no reserve, this us what happened...)
I was weighing thoughts on running an inline fuel filter, versus just relying on the filter screen in the actual petcock. You can get fairly nice brass or bronze porous reusable washable filters for 1/4 inch and 5/16 inch fuel line, 7mm (550 & smaller) or 8mm (750+)
Running one of the straight through type clear plastic filters, having it come out of the petcock and having the hose making a gradual 90 degree bends down to the center of the carbs, I did have one of these plastic type filters break on me once, and have another one that you can see from the air-cooled engine heat, softened and bent into a radius on its own.
Advising a friend on parts to buy for his first motorcycle, a 78 GS550 that I am rebuilding with him, I found some 1/4 inch filters with the brass / bronze element that are actually in a 90-degree configuration, which was nice especially for the 550 (tighter quarters than a 750+ or a twin). I was wishing for a Billet aluminum version of that, but no such luck, only the $10 Emgo/BikeMaster straight Billet aluminum / brass filters.
So that left me weighing thoughts of a Billet aluminum filter that could potentially vibrate and come unthreaded, versus the plastic clear type that could potentially crack under stress, or melt (less likely), vs the more guaranteed leak free method running no filter and just one section of hose with two clamps, and relying on the petcock filter screen only. Like I said, I have definitely found lots of fine rust particles in the bottom of the fuel bowls before.
Opinions on petcock-filter-only vs clear plastic vs billet?
As far as filter element style, I only opted for the brass or bronze porous type reusable washable filters, and don't care to use the filters that are the same type of mesh screen as the petcock screen, and don't care for the paper element type as much as the brass either.
I have definitely pulled apart some carburetors and found very fine remnants of rust powder in the bottoms of the the bowls. But if you have ever pulled a petcock out of the fuel tank, they had originally a tall plastic frame with a filter mesh in it. This piece also serves as the facilitator of the reserve function on the fuel petcock. It has two different height inlets so that "on" draws from the higher portion, and "reserve" draws from the lowest portion off the bottom of the tank.
A few times I have found these plastic filter/reserve inserts for the petcocks have come loose and fallen out even (if you have no reserve, this us what happened...)
I was weighing thoughts on running an inline fuel filter, versus just relying on the filter screen in the actual petcock. You can get fairly nice brass or bronze porous reusable washable filters for 1/4 inch and 5/16 inch fuel line, 7mm (550 & smaller) or 8mm (750+)
Running one of the straight through type clear plastic filters, having it come out of the petcock and having the hose making a gradual 90 degree bends down to the center of the carbs, I did have one of these plastic type filters break on me once, and have another one that you can see from the air-cooled engine heat, softened and bent into a radius on its own.
Advising a friend on parts to buy for his first motorcycle, a 78 GS550 that I am rebuilding with him, I found some 1/4 inch filters with the brass / bronze element that are actually in a 90-degree configuration, which was nice especially for the 550 (tighter quarters than a 750+ or a twin). I was wishing for a Billet aluminum version of that, but no such luck, only the $10 Emgo/BikeMaster straight Billet aluminum / brass filters.
So that left me weighing thoughts of a Billet aluminum filter that could potentially vibrate and come unthreaded, versus the plastic clear type that could potentially crack under stress, or melt (less likely), vs the more guaranteed leak free method running no filter and just one section of hose with two clamps, and relying on the petcock filter screen only. Like I said, I have definitely found lots of fine rust particles in the bottom of the fuel bowls before.
Opinions on petcock-filter-only vs clear plastic vs billet?
As far as filter element style, I only opted for the brass or bronze porous type reusable washable filters, and don't care to use the filters that are the same type of mesh screen as the petcock screen, and don't care for the paper element type as much as the brass either.

