Poor Man's Octane Booster that Really Works- Long Explanation
Poor Man's Octane Booster that Really Works- Long Explanation
"Appearant octane", anyway, actual octane can't be "boosted", only bought, as in aviation fuel and racegas, but "appearant" octane means it runs the same, just costs less. Used to use tetra-ethyl lead, instead.
It just so happens that ALL auto/motorcycle makers use, as a standard, 100 octane fuel when they rate fuel economy, hp, ect, that is the testing standard (which is why you never quite get the milage they advertise), and at STP, or standard temp and pressure (of outside air). I used to take my old '79 GS1000 down to the old commuter airport and buy 100 octane AvGas for mine (after running it as dry as I could.. I'd have to borrow their gas can!) and that got me a substantial increase in both power and milage (anyone who'd buy regular 87 oct is a dummy, screw dollars per gallon and miles per gallon, using super 92 octane gets you the most miles per dollar, and is the best for your engine, as well as the best bargain) but I have come up with an even better solution: MOTHBALLS. They made premium pump gas do exactly the same thing, for a lot less money. (poor man's octane booster that works)
But they have to be NAPTHELENE moth balls, there are 2 different types in nearly identical boxes. The paradi-somthingorothersomethingorother type that are the same chemical as the "big white mint" they use in men's urinals, those wont do it. Napthelene mothblalls, 1 per gallon of premium pump gas will have the EXACT same effect (raising the "appearant octane", instead of the actual octane) as 100 octane AvGas, except for the carbon fouling reduction that a motorvehicle won't show, anyway.
I have a "cabin" out in the woods, that uses a generator (the thing carbon fouls all the time, except on AvGas.. it's made to run at one rpm all the time, and at altitude, and that was the only discernable difference between aviation fuel and pumpgas+mothballs, other than cost), it ran about 4 to 4 1/2 hours on pump gas, it ran between 8 and 12 hours with a mothball in the tank.
Suffice it to say that you'll get a lot more whump, about half over better milage (tested and confirmed, normal increase) and I rebuilt a number of my engines and there was absolutely no "harm" done, in fact, they were in better shape than they should have been. The big trade-off is HEAT, your engine will run cooler... MUCH cooler. For every 10 BTU's your engine makes, 9 go out the radiator (or wherever, with an air cooled engine: gasoline is about 10% efficient as a motorfuel), so even a 2% increase in efficiancy, that is LESS heat, means 20% more thrust/milage/HP ("go"). Actually, my math said I got about a 5% increase in efficiency, or about 50% more "go", try it yourself, if you doubt it. The only drawback is that I reeked of mothballs all the time, since I carried them on my bike all the time! The other thing is that mothballs inhibit preignition or "knock", so your engine runs cooler, knocks less, gets better milage, makes more power, by using the highest possible octane 100 or better, mothballs make 100 "appearant octane". In the old days pre-historic gas had tetra-ethyl lead added as an appearant octane booster, or "anti-knock" additive, but it's rediculously poisonous, so they took it out, now all gas is still called "unleaded"
Use 1 NAPTHELENE mothball per gallon of premium pump-gas, drop them in, they'll disolve in a couple of minutes. If you have it down, and especially if you have a trap screen in the filler neck (cars), put the mothballs in FIRST, the gas going in will disolve them.
I have an AS degree in AMT (automotive technology) and I'm an ASE Master Autotech, recognized in 48 states and I have a motorvehicle repair dealers licance in one of them, I know what I'm talking about, and the usual arguments like "it'll burn up your engine" just don't hold up.. actually, your engine will run a lot cooler, and knock less, mothballs leave absolutely no deposits or residue, and any difference in deposits or carbon build up is nullified by any water cooled engine's thermostat. As for air cooled engines, well, I could idle at a red light a lot longer without getting really hot. but there was a slight drawback, it took a tiny bit longer on choke to warm it up, although not much, and I never complained about that, or really noticed it, for that matter.
If you record your milage for tax, whatever, or just know what you spend on fuel, try it yourself, expect 50% more miles per gallon, average.
If you were worried about the difference, low octane will tend to "knock" more, so the timing can't be quite as advanced. New engines with computers have a "knock" sensor, and control the timing with that among it's arsenal of sensors, a computer controlled engine CAN'T preignaite while the computer is in closed loop, that is, when it's at operating temp, however they can while they are cold, or in "closed loop", the computer's solution to "choke" until it gets to 180 degrees. The computer does nothing but flood the engine with the richest mixture until it gets to operating tempurature, the side benefiet is that if the computer fails, the car still runs, just really, really, rich. At least the early computerized cars, anyway. Taking out the thermostat would do a number on them, too. Knock is BAD, that is when the maximum pressure is reached too soon, and the piston is still coming up and hits the flamefront that should be pushing it down, bends rods and valves and all kinds of bad things, pre-computer engines tend to do it if the timing is too advanced, when you dump on a lot of throttle, in too high a gear, like passing without downshifting, when you hear a rattle or pinging sound.... that's BAD. Your older engine has surely been timed to run on lower octane unleaded gasoline, by now, and how would you know, now, if leaded regular knocked less, anyway? I think the fact that any older engines knock at all is a side effect of not running on leaded regular, or low octane gasoline.