Required reading for all forum users!!!
Welcome!
Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.
A note to new registrants...
All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.
A Special Note about Email accounts!
DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.
A note to old forum members...
I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.
Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.
Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...
If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.
If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.
I believe what Joe meant is that superior performance and safety go hand in hand. A tire that sticks well in any condition is a safe tire.Safety margin's not a major factor for you? Biggest factor for me. Maybe I'm not destined to be in that 99%.
You would have to be an expert rider to need better traction/handling than the Avons provide, they are excellent tires. There is no safety advantage.
Theoretically, if you accidentally were pushed to the limits of the Avon's traction, and still need more in order to avoid getting smooshed/highsided/lowsided/t-boned, the SD's could potentially save your life.
You are learning to ride in Phoenix, on an 1100E, and you think some magic tires will make you safe?
OK.
I But, recently, I found a combo that I absolutely LOVE. Im running an Avon RoadRider rear with an Avon Venom X front. The combo is, in my opinion, outstanding. Nice feedback from the road, great stickiness, and I got a whole season out of the rear, and plus on the front.
Bad situations can crop up unexpectedly with even the best of riders, and in the event that maintaining a safe following distance, constantly scanning for threats, and riding in an manner that minimizes risk in as effective manner as possible, I find myself in such an unexpected bad situation, I wish to have a machine that is as capable as it can be.
Having used both, I would suggest Turtle get the SD this time around, and the Avons to replace them, when worn. Going by his argument, I think he would be at a psychological disadvantage with the Avons (not necessarily based on reality), but that is the last thing you need when tipping the bike into a turn at high speed, or an emergency situation....I guess Joe prefers with the SD for precisely the same reason, actually.
Tony.l
True, but I had sub standard tires on it before, and it handled WAY worse than it does now. The nice high profile of the Avons make the bike feel much much lighter than it is in the steering dept. Turning in is much quicker and almost effortless. Like Brian said, if you're not ready for it, it will scare the bejesus out of you the first good turn you put it in.. . Ive also gone to great lengths to improve its handling characteristics, but, apples to apples, yes, its a better design, but the tires, compared to what it had on it before, make a larger difference than I would have suspected. I love the combo, and yes, ive used the RoadRider in front before, the Venom feels a little more aggro, which i like.It's because it's an '83 ES. Huge improvement in handling over previous GSes.
And yet, you are riding a thirty year old motorcycle, with something like half the braking and handling of a modern bike
Things that can confuse accurate evaluation are tired/sagging suspension,excessive play in steering head and wheel bearings, incorrectly graded fork oil (for your weight and riding style), over sized tyres for rim width, poorly performing brakes, brake disc run out, etc,etc.
It's because it's an '83 ES. Huge improvement in handling over previous GSes.
Its is unfortunate that your 27 year old Bike is a dinosaur but I respect your home work trying to make it all it can be.
Youll be draggin all sorts of hard shinny parts long before you push either brand tire over the edge.
Really ? Better than a EZ or ED ?
Extra Stability ? Enhanced Suspension ?
Smaller front wheel, completely new frame design, better brakes, smaller bike overall.... Huge difference in handling and braking.
This probably applies to the smaller ES bikes (700/750) that benefited from upgrades, but the 1100 variety is essentially the same bike, with different cosmetics (square headlight with fairing & the blue/white scheme). I don't know if even the 1100 Kats had much changed, apart from the clip-on style bars, and different cosmetic package.:-k
Tony.
OK, I thought the 1100 changed the same year as the 750.
Its is unfortunate that your 27 year old Bike is a dinosaur but I respect your home work trying to make it all it can be.
Youll be draggin all sorts of hard shinny parts long before you push either brand tire over the edge.
Really ? Better than a EZ or ED ?
Extra Stability ? Enhanced Suspension ?