Thinking......what is it?

[argonsagas]

As humans we constantly want "proof" of our thinking, no matter how positive or obscure our thoughts may be.
"Science" as we know of it today, is incomplete.

Then comes the problem for many of us:

"Science" cannot answer all possible questions,
and
"Science" cannot ask all possible questions..

It may not be for everyone, but a truly fascinating picture is prismatically portrayed in this article:

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-...tiverse-real/?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

 

[Cipher]

As humans we constantly want "proof" of our thinking, no matter how positive or obscure our thoughts may be.
"Science" as we know of it today, is incomplete.

a thesis with no supporting dialectic.

read some of Jung's autobiography. He spewed indefensible anti-science as gospel too.​

 

[argonsagas]

It appears that your "thinking", in this case, is itself incomplete as the word "incomplete" is not equivalent, nor is it comparable to, "anti-science".

 

[argonsagas]

Perhaps you would gain some more knowledge.if you carefully read this article.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/its-...rty-20250808/?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

 

[Grimly]

"Thinking, what is it?"
"Well, it's something that seperates us from the beasts."
"Oh, you mean like that crowd down the road."
"Yep."

 

[LAB3]

I've often heard it said that the arts are what separates us from the beasts. Since AI is taking care of that now I guess we know what we've been reduced to.