• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

79 1000 engine number

trippivot

Forum Sage
Past Site Supporter
ok so I bought a 1979 gs 1000E {n} American for sure .. cleaned up carbs , got it running nice . time to sell it. well. I think I lost a sale because the engine number is above the listed info on ozebook. I don't fault a purist owner wanting a number matching machine.

my question is does anyone know of a bike with original parts that are out of the posted range?

my VIN is listed gs1000-51xxxx in range from the info at ozebook - but the engine number is over the 121,xxx...

and get this my number is-- gs1000- 123456 which is over the 79 year and under the 1980 starting number .
 
Suzukis never were "numbers matching" machines. None of my 3 GS 1000s have matching engine and frame numbers, and I'm willing to bet that no member has a numbers matching machine
 
problem was not that the numbers were not exactly the same - according to the buyer my engine case number is too high to be a genuine 1979 original -

I do some research and aussie web site called ozebook has some numbers but I guess thee is always something new to learn about gs motocycles
 
I think that it's a case of trusting the internet for a model from another country

If the number on the cases is too high, the motor would be an 80 with the BS carbs, not a 79 with VMcarbs

Very few 80 GS 1000s sold in the US
 
problem was not that the numbers were not exactly the same - according to the buyer my engine case number is too high to be a genuine 1979 original -

I do some research and aussie web site called ozebook has some numbers but I guess thee is always something new to learn about gs motocycles

I think the published Suzuki numbers were numbers that came out preproduction and not actual production numbers. My '79 GS1000N was a very earlier production in July 1978 and the chassis number is about 130 earlier than the first number listed for '79 and the engine is about 250 after the start number. And yes it is all original. I've known of this bike since it had 5,000 miles on it and bought it with about 8,000.
 
Thank you sandy for your input -- that is the exact situation I wanted to learn more about. I knew there had to be some gaps or overlaps in production.
That was a pretty exciting time in motorcycle history and I the Pre 17 digit VIN era there are a lot of variance.
 
Intake port size is a better method of judging between '79 and '80, with the later using CV carbs and larger ports. Regarding worrying about a "numbers matching" machine, I'd like to know where this (possible) buyer is? God knows nobody around here worries about such things other than maybe on a 1000S. Tell this guy to join up. We need more guys around here that do serious restorations!
 
Yep, Suzuki engine numbers don't mean squat. That guy missed out on a nice bike. Oh well.

There are also plenty of cases of factory mongrels created as Suzuki used up whatever was in the parts bins.

Not to mention that many DMV offices didn't pay a lot of attention back then. There are plenty of cases of, for example, someone buying a leftover '79 model in early 1980, which then got registered as a 1980 model and led to decades of low-grade irritation.

Let's put it another way: Suzuki ain't and wasn't Honda... the sketchy dribs and drabs of information that somehow trickled out of Hamamatsu four or five decades ago can't be taken as gospel.
 
If it is a 17 Digit vin, it will show date of manufacture on the vin plate. Where did he get his info from? Surely if it was published, someone here would know about it. Only Yamaha had matching frame/engine numbers, but I have been out of the biz for 19 years now. Good luck finding matching numbers on any bike than was prone to heavy modifications.
 
DMV offices don't pay a lot of attention now.... :)

Man, they sure do around here. The evil shrews at the Indiana BMV (it's a Bureau here, not a Department. No idea why.) have killed more cool old bikes than ethanol, crashes, mice, and crispy stators put together. They absolutely live for the thrill of denial...
 
They're a bureau here so as to identify that no actual work will be performed on the premises.
 
Back
Top