D
DohcBikes
Guest
Nodody said it would add braking force.I have never seen a GS that needed more rear braking, except for one with a brake problem.
Cool.They all need more front brake, the older ones need it more than the later ones
,
How many is that, exactly? All of them? Yes they will lock the rear up. Nobody said they wouldn't.but every one I have ever ridden had more than enough rear braking to lock the rear wheel effortlessly.
Cool.They were designed for the tires of the late 70s and early 80s, tires in that day only had so much traction, only so much weight could transfer to the front tire.
Oh really? Well thats contradictory. With better tires, more braking will also be available to the rear without it locking up. Some riders DO use their rear brake more than others, and to them, wasting that extra braking traction would be silly.Now with better tires more weight shifts, even less rear braking is needed.
Well, i'm thinking since he doubled the amount of brakes and discs on the front he's off to a great start.It is so easy to double or triple the braking ability on any GS by improving the front brakes, which will actually do something to improve the ability to stop.
Looks coolDrill the rear? I guess if you think it looks cool.
reduces brake fade
saves weight
All facts.
What are manufacturers using these days, solid rotors on the rear? Geez i'll have to search google to really know the answer but golly i think most of them are drilled.
If they had rear braking all figured out in the 70's, why the heck have they changed it? Stupid azz manufacturers anyway.
