T
terry
Guest
javajuice said:I would be late in saying this, but for others reading this you should know that it would be better to have a fitting on each pipe not after they have collected. You want a reading for each carb not an average of all four.
Actually I was happy with an average for all four. As nice as it would be to know what each individual cylinder is doing, it isn't critical, keeping in mind that there are other influences that can't be similarly regularly monitored, like piston/cylinder/valve wear, individual ignition voltage per cylinder etc. I think people can get themselves "wrapped around the axles" with technicalities, particularly for something as simple as a 24 year old bike. Remember, this is not an F1 racing car!
My cousin ran a small Suzuki dealership for 20 years and used a factory exhaust gas analyser that has a sensor that you just shoved up the end of your pipe, whether you bike has one cylinder or 6, with excellent results, and although he sold his shop years ago, he continues to use the device when tuning one of his own, or friend's bikes.
My 2000 model Toyota Hi-Lux work truck has electronic fuel injection, electronic engine management etc, but only has one sensor located (you guessed it) just after the collector, as were several other modern cars I looked at when I decided to make my own analyser, (I didn't see any with individual sensors?) so I'm assuming that if one is good enough in every other modern vehicle in the country, then why do I need four?
C'mon guys, let's try to keep it real, there's no harm in talking in theoretical terms, but as you can see, I like to actually DO stuff as opposed to just talk about it, and get a result. The end product might not always be as brilliant as the concept, but as long as there is an end result (and not just a lot of hot air) then I'm happy. :wink: