Just some comments on GS charging systems........
Automotive charging systems are load regulated. Output is regulated to match demand of accessories and battery state. GS systems are "fixed" output. The stator produces a charging current relative to the rpm/engine speed. The stock stators produce 280 watts at 5000 rpm. Wattage varies with rpm, so at 1000 rpm, output would be 56 watts, 2000-112 watts, 3000-168 watts, etc. Regulator/rectifiers regulate voltage, but not wattage to the battery. A new battery is aproximately 85-90% efficient in accepting a charge. An older battery (still in servicable limits) may be only 70% efficient in accepting a charge. The design point charging voltage of R/R's is about 14.7 volts. This is the upper limit and if your R/R charges at a rate greater than that, it is faulty and should be replaced. A fully charged new battery will show about 12.8 volts after it has "settled" for a bit.
87% efficiency at an electrical charging pressure of 14.7 volts would result in a battery level of about 12.8 volts ...depending on battery and wiring harness condition.
I dont consider the GS charging system to be delicate, but it is an unregulated, load balanced system and consequently operates correctly within a narrow set of parameters. Too much draw and the battery will not be charged. Too little draw and the battery will be overcharged. Slight amounts of excess charging current can be shunted to ground and disappated through the R/R cooling fins as heat. It is why you do not want to cruise with your headlight off (among other reasons

)
Also, the harness wiring and lighting switch are not sized to carry an additional 110 watts of driving lights. It would be necessary to run wiring and switches for that addition rather than piggybacking the load onto a circuit that is already operating near max capacity.
In looking up accessories/lighting wattages in my Suzuki manual, average electrical load with a 60/55 headlight is aprox 90 watts plus engine, plus harness/switches resistances, plus use of turn signals and any running lights. My estimation is that aprox 125 watts is needed to run the electricals and overcome 20 year old harness resistances plus the engine's requirements. From experience with a dead stator and lights off running on battery alone , beginning with a half charged battery, the engine will run for aprox 30 minutes. If we assume there were aprox 5 amps usable in the battery, that would be a power consumption of 60 watts or so.
Total electrical consumption would then be about 185 watts. If we take a total output of 280 watts @87% charging efficiency. we find we have 243 watts available. That leaves 37 watts going to battery, or about 3 amps.
****(edit)..... 243 watts available and using 185 leaves 58 watts and not 37 as I had stated. I'll leave the following numbers though as that does not alter the point I was trying to make******
This assumes all operation is above 5000 rpm and we have maximaum charging current always available. You can see that since the stator is producing 56 watts per 1000 rpm, then a reduction in rpm from 5000 to 4400 will result in a charge rate to the battery of zero. Below that rpm, the system will be operating at a loss. Due to variances I cant be more precise than that, but at least this demonstrates the situation. 4400 would be perfect rpm (based on my numbers). All electrical demands would be met, the battery would be maintained and there would be no current shunted to ground by the R/R and no excess heat.
The system needs to remain electrically balanced. That is why I do not use LED tail light or running lights. The energy I would save would need to be shunted to ground and that heats up the R/R. The ideal is to consume all the output with just enough left over the keep the battery charged.
Earl