• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

GSXR Shock in a 1150

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gerry
  • Start date Start date
G

Gerry

Guest
A few People had asked about upgrading the shock on a 1150. I had mounted a fox double clicker out of a 90 GSXR 750 a few years back. I took the swingarm out to try and raise the rear ride height a bit after installing the 89 GSXR front end. I thought it would be a good time to take a picture and show how easy it was to do this.

The only modification was at the top. I took a grinder to the linkage to fit the shock and then had a spacer welded in for strength.

The Shock was the same length as the 1150 from eye to eye. There is a threaded rod for a small amount of adjustment. This is the part I adjusted this year to try to give me a little more ride height. I didn't hit anything last year because of the clearance, but when on the side stand when parked at the curb it looked like the bike would fall over real easy.



gsxrshock.jpg
 
Nice job Gerry. I may mount the '97 GSXR shock I've got for my swingarm swap after seeing this. Just replacing the shock might do just about as well. Just need to measure the shocks.
 
Thanks Billy,

I have the shock set up real stiff and this might be why I don't have any ground clearance problems. When I had the other shock the bike would squat quite a bit when I sat on it.

I was only able to adjust it up a 1/4 of an inch more from where I had it set. I'll try it like this and if I need more height I'll have a new adjuster made for the top of the shock or fox might even make one.

The only bad thing is it's hard to reach the rebound damping knob when everything is back in place.
 
Billy Ricks said:
Nice job Gerry. I may mount the '97 GSXR shock I've got for my swingarm swap after seeing this. Just replacing the shock might do just about as well. Just need to measure the shocks.

If you get around to doing this, I would be interested as to how it comes out.
 
Gerry,

I hate to dampen the spirit of innovation, but I noticed the shock is mounted upside down. I'm just wondering if that has any effect on damping that you know of? The shocks are usually nitrogen charged and internal valving needs to be submerged in oil for damping to work right. mark m may have some insight into this.
 
I'm just wondering if that has any effect on damping that you know of? The shocks are usually nitrogen charged and internal valving needs to be submerged in oil for damping to work right

It shouldn't affect the shock at all, because there is no air inside the shock body, just oil. The nitrogen charge is separated from the oil by a floating piston, so you can run it in any position you like. On older, non-pressurized shocks this can be an issue, but it shouldn't be a problem at all here. I will check with a buddy who used to do suspension work for a living, just to be sure, but I don't think it's a problem.

Mark
 
Billy Ricks said:
Gerry,

I hate to dampen the spirit of innovation, but I noticed the shock is mounted upside down. I'm just wondering if that has any effect on damping that you know of? The shocks are usually nitrogen charged and internal valving needs to be submerged in oil for damping to work right. mark m may have some insight into this.

:lol: I had some concerns about mounting it that way as well. Every one I asked at the time didn't seem to think it would hurt to mount it like that. But no one said anything about the internal valving needing to be submerged in oil to work right. This is a very good point.

As far as it not performing 100%, maybe it isn't, but it is a very big improvement from what it was. For me the shock works great and the bike handles real well.
 
mark m said:
I'm just wondering if that has any effect on damping that you know of? The shocks are usually nitrogen charged and internal valving needs to be submerged in oil for damping to work right

It shouldn't affect the shock at all, because there is no air inside the shock body, just oil. The nitrogen charge is separated from the oil by a floating piston, so you can run it in any position you like. On older, non-pressurized shocks this can be an issue, but it shouldn't be a problem at all here. I will check with a buddy who used to do suspension work for a living, just to be sure, but I don't think it's a problem.

Mark
Thanks Mark, It would be good to know if it makes a difference.
 
Mark's response makes sense. I just wasn't sure if the nitrogen was kept seperate from the oil. It would almost have to be for a reservoir to even work right. Being upside down would make getting to the preload easier. I'm sure it does make a big difference in handling. The '97 shock I have has a piggyback reservoir so I would have to mount it right side up to keep the reservoir from hanging too low. It has one end like your top so I'm thinking bronze bushings between the swingarm mount and the shock mount.
 
Gerry.

What kind of joint is there on your modified installation? Is there a roller bearing inside your homemade spacer? If not, the bolt is the joint and if you tighten it securly the link will stick and also wear down the bolt as it moves inside from suspension. Am I missing something?

Regards, Chris.
 
chrille_08 said:
Gerry.

What kind of joint is there on your modified installation? Is there a roller bearing inside your homemade spacer? If not, the bolt is the joint and if you tighten it securly the link will stick and also wear down the bolt as it moves inside from suspension. Am I missing something?

Regards, Chris.

Hey Chris,

No bearing and the bolt is the joint. This will be the fifth season with the shock and no wear any wear 8O . I understand what your saying about the linkage sticking and I don't think it does. It might be a good idea to have a bearing in there if someone was to do this mod, but as far as I can tell it's not needed.
 
I just heard back from my buddy and he says it makes no difference and I had it correct on the internals. So mount it however it fits and don't worry about it... 8)


Mark
 
Back
Top