T
TheCafeKid
Guest
Nope, you have to remove THREE! Three whole nuts!!
-
Required reading for all forum users!!!
Welcome!
Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.A note to new registrants...
All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.A Special Note about Email accounts!
DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.A note to old forum members...
I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.
Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...
-
Returning Visitors
If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.
If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.
K
koolaid_kid
Guest
Ever had a chain let loose and wrap up into a rear wheel skid at 60mph+ ?
No, me neither. But I may be a rookie with only +150k miles on chain bikes.
How am I doing, Brian?
T
TheCafeKid
Guest
My step dads buddy had that happen, at about 30mph...killed him. Kinda a freak thing, but it HAS happened....
Ever had a chain let loose and wrap up into a rear wheel skid at 60mph+ ?
No, me neither. But I may be a rookie with only +150k miles on chain bikes.
How am I doing, Brian?
You need to spend more time in the dirt!
Actually, I believe dpep had a drive shaft lock up on him and send him into a skid. I don't remember all the details of what he found when he examined it. Maybe he'll see this thread and chime in on it.
T
TheCafeKid
Guest
I would bet he lost the oil in the secondary box. Steve's sons 850 had a leak in the secondary, locked up on him on a test ride. We put it up on the centerstand in the garage, and I ran it thru the gears, letting it spinn untill it did it again. Without oil, or with low oil, the gear box will function untill it gets hot, then it seizes up. Stopped it dead. Could be dangerous depending on where and when it happened, as Don found out. Yet another reason to take a chain drive bike...
:-\\\
D
doctorgonzo
Guest
Chains perform better, but wear out, and have to be heavily maintained.
Shafties are heavier and inflexible (can't change sprockets), but they are low Maint and last pretty much forever.
Pick your poison.
Shafties are heavier and inflexible (can't change sprockets), but they are low Maint and last pretty much forever.
Pick your poison.
T
TheCafeKid
Guest
Well I dunno about YOU, but i prefer not to play with nuts...or shafts for that matterAh hah, just as I suspected, shafties have more nuts than chains.
M
MacGyver
Guest
Performance oriented riders (and usually mechanically inclined) will vote for chains. Convenience oriented riders (and usually high mileage riders) will vote for shaft drives. Some riders will just argue, err, debate no matter what.
K
koolaid_kid
Guest
I had a 77 CanAm 250 (rotary engine model) and a 78 RM125C. Rode until 1984 when I went back to college to get my engineering degree. Never lost a chain on either of them, either. Did a lot of air time (WOOHOO) and spent a lot of time wrenching, cleaning the sand out of bearings and changing rings and such. But not rewrapping or unwrapping a chain. My biggest problem was that I sucked as a motocrosser, plus it is expensive to stay current, so I spent a lot of time just off-roading it.You need to spend more time in the dirt!
K
koolaid_kid
Guest
No we won't! Yes we will!
I agree.
The 850G was the HEAVIEST GS ever produced (not including the GK with all that added baggness) Even heavier than its 1000 and 1100cc counterparts...why? I dunno...
The 850 engine had the kick starter in '79, and the head has more material than the 1000 and 1100 (smaller bores on the 850, same sized engine).
These two differences added about 15 lbs to the bike. The later version of the 850G was essentially the same weight as both the 1000G and 1100G.
Dry weights of each bike (from Suzuki brochures and magazine tests):
'79 850G - 557 lbs
'80 1000G - 543 lbs
'83 850G - 540 lbs
'83 1100G - 545 lbs
T
TheCafeKid
Guest
Well there ya have it. Plain and simple black and white facts ladies and gents... Cant do better than that.
So where does that leave us?
850 shaftie= overweight, yet stupendously durable while not quite as nimble, yet suprisingly so, Caddy of the GS world
1100E= sleek, deadly, might end you in a back brace, dont take it for long trips (unless you LIKE that sort of thing..i do) MIGHT end you in the morgue, cat like Ferrari of the GS world...
Pick your poison..
By the way, the dry weight of the '83 GS1100E is listed by Suzuki at 522 lbs., only 35 lbs lighter than the original 850G. However, once you add in the larger tank capacity and the drive train oil of the 850G (hopefully nobody tries to ride one dry), the wet weight of the 850G is about 50 lbs more than the 1100E.
Last edited:
T
TheCafeKid
Guest
I thought the tank caps were the same at 5.8??
Have you ever actually put 5.8 gallons into your 1100's tank? I've put 6.1 gallons into my 1000G's tank when it was bone-dry. I know my brother ran his 1100E's tank dry (I had to ride to a gas station and fetch him a gas can full of gas) and as I recall, he only got a total of 5.4 gallons into it.
I'll have to call and double check with him, but I believe those numbers are correct. He'll remember, he keeps a log book of every drop of gas he's ever put into every vehicle he's ever owned.
I remember he was ****ed because he couldn't get the "full" rating amount into it, and blamed the shortness of capacity for his calculational error
.
T
TheCafeKid
Guest
Nope. But i dont know exactly how far my reserve will get me either. Most ive ever put in it was 5gal, but i dont hit reserve untill about 4.5 is gone. BTW you'll never get that last 1/4-1/2 gallon out of the tank before the bike is sucking air, so throw that out the window...
Similar threads
