• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

  • In order to help others find info on a particular bike, be sure to put the year, make or model of bike that you are asking a question about, in the Topic Title. This will allow people to pass by posts they have no interest in.

How's the CB1100 selling?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brownford
  • Start date Start date
Dealer here still has an early 2014 black one he can't move. They have sold 2 since they came out. He won't order any more. Honda screwed themselves on this bike, it could have been a real ground shaker if they had put a bit more thought into it. I think it's sick HP rating is its down fall.
 
Dealer here still has an early 2014 black one he can't move. They have sold 2 since they came out. He won't order any more. Honda screwed themselves on this bike, it could have been a real ground shaker if they had put a bit more thought into it. I think it's sick HP rating is its down fall.

Amen brother, been saying this all along. If they can't make a bike 30 years later that's AT LEAST as powerful as the original, somebody's missed the boat. Big time.
 
I saw a young guy with his gal on a CB1100 a couple of Sundays back. Nice bike.

Lots of other bikes heavily discounted as well, I think this is common to have 3 year models hanging around especially in the shorter riding season states. I wonder how they handle the losses, Honda must help them out somehow.
 
The only selling point, I see or hear about, is the "retro look", are there other noteworthy perks that I'm missing??
 
Triumph has been selling lots of Bonnevilles for years. So many that they recently expanded the lineup. Perhaps the CB1100s biggest problem is that lots of retro buyers would rather have a Bonneville.
 
If you compare an '80-'81 GS1100E to the new Honda, there is not one thing that the GS doesn't do better than the new Honda. Acceleration, braking, handling, fuel economy, rider and passenger comfort, styling, etc.
The ONLY two things that the New Honda has over THE 30+ YEAR OLD SUZUKI is fuel injection and the fact that it is NEW and comes with a warranty. I will keep my Suzie's and my money thank you. ;) :D

They don't charge exra for the depreciation, either. Like the GB500, it might get a following in 25 years. They were not selling in Anchorage.
 
I just think that a replica UJM should come with the versatility that UJMs had. And, for that matter, after Honda has had nearly 40 years to work on it, it should be faster than the real thing.
 
Cafe Racer magazine had an article about the CB1100 ? they did some mods to the motor. Might be worth reading if anyone finds a sweet deal but wants a bit more performance.




I have an 2009 Triumph Bonneville.
When I?m out riding, more people ask questions about that ?authentic? retro than ask questions about my ?real? retro bikes (GT750, XS650, CB650SC).
At bike shows its the opposite. The GT750 gets most of the questions.


So, perhaps the ?authentic? retro market isn?t a good market opportunity for a Honda four cylinder CB.
 
6K for a new CB1100 sounds like a great deal. I have seen a couple retro paint jobs on this bike and it look awesome. Have seen it done in the cb900f silver scheme as well as an early 70's CB750 scheme.
 
6K for a new CB1100 sounds like a great deal. I have seen a couple retro paint jobs on this bike and it look awesome. Have seen it done in the cb900f silver scheme as well as an early 70's CB750 scheme.

I agree, at 6K you could probably throw a couple grand into it and have something special. Still can't believe Honda could make such a bike with less performance than it's 30 year old predecessor. Makes absolutely no sense.
 
I'll admit that this price makes me look closer. I read a few articles last night that made me like the bike more than I did seven years back. In CB900f colors, it would be badass.
 
Most people don't need tons of power. Look at the cruiser market for evidence. 70 hp at the rear wheel will get the rider in all kinds of trouble if they are not careful. I've owned cars that made less power. I agree with the general sentiment though; after 40 years we should get more of something. Power, (less) weight, better suspension, something. The performance of this bike doesn't move the needle enough considering all the years. I suppose it will be uber reliable, but GS bikes already have the covered. Regardless, it's a nice bike. And at the discounted price a great alternative for guys that may be eyeballing a cruizer. I'd much rather ride this thing than a Shadow.
 
Agreed, as I'm not a cruiser person either. For me, I may be happier with a nice old Yam 750 triple, as mentioned somewhere else around here, Neither seem great at anything, were just OK for everything.
 
Most people don't need tons of power. Look at the cruiser market for evidence. 70 hp at the rear wheel will get the rider in all kinds of trouble if they are not careful. I've owned cars that made less power. I agree with the general sentiment though; after 40 years we should get more of something. Power, (less) weight, better suspension, something. The performance of this bike doesn't move the needle enough considering all the years. I suppose it will be uber reliable, but GS bikes already have the covered. Regardless, it's a nice bike. And at the discounted price a great alternative for guys that may be eyeballing a cruizer. I'd much rather ride this thing than a Shadow.
LOL. You just reminded me of a bit of amusement I had a long time ago.
Years ago I had a bike with 72 hp & a car with 86 hp.
 
Back
Top