• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Project: Cool Kat II

  • Thread starter Thread starter russr33
  • Start date Start date
Too modern for my tastes. I think some 83 GPz 750 / 1100 non turbo gauges would be killer, though.

And crusty or not, it's nothing a little paint and polish won't clear up!
 
Slowly but surely. Not going to start gathering parts just yet as title still hasn't made it to me. I think everything is going to be ok but until I have it in my hands I'll hold here for now.

IMG_1604.jpg
 
Well I FINALLY received the title for the Kat in the mail yesterday so this project can get going again. Better late than never I guess.
 
Well I FINALLY received the title for the Kat in the mail yesterday so this project can get going again. Better late than never I guess.

Congrats Russ, U have had more than your share of real head bangers that have worked out well. :D
 
Ok so a little progress. My buddy Jay fabricated what I think is a very cool fork brace. Whatcha think?

IMG_2535.jpg

IMG_2536.jpg

IMG_2538.jpg


This is a prototype. He has a cnc machine and is going to make a few more with a slightly different design.
 
That is quite different but pretty cool :cool:. I wish I had a CNC machine.

Looking good!
 
To me it doesn't look like that will stiffen things up at all. The "hinge" in the corner defeats the purpose. A tall brace, for the upside down fork, should either be wide or made of 2 parallel braces.
 
I'm no expert on these sort of things but that fork brace seems like it would sway due to all the bolted connections. Also that is adding more unsprung weight to your front wheel. While it may work to some degree it seems flimsy to me.

If you have access to a CNC machine why not cut out a more traditional looking fork brace that clamps around the forks from the left and right side. I feel this would not only brace them better but also save on weight.

Again I am no expert and simply did a quick 5 minute CAD drawing based on how I've seen other fork braces.

Perhaps someone who is actually an engineer could verify my design concept (or tell me I should stick to architecture :rolleyes:) Whichever would be cool.
 
Last edited:
To me it doesn't look like that will stiffen things up at all. The "hinge" in the corner defeats the purpose. A tall brace, for the upside down fork, should either be wide or made of 2 parallel braces.

+1, that ads very little stiffness if any. The two sides of the forks are still free to move independently by only bending that tiny end where the bolts go to the caliper mount. It does look like it could cause the caliper mounting boss to break off under certain circumstances. Longer legs catching two mounts on each side would be much better... Front forks are one of the worst places to play around with amateur engineering IMHO. Methinks the designer does not understand the forces involved.

Doesn't that fender have a real brace built in underneath it?
What do modern high performance bikes with upside down forks use for bracing?
Do they really need anything?
 
Last edited:
I'm very surprised that the upside down setup would need any extra bracing...

I'm also worried about your mounts. They are cast so probably quite brittle & will not like being "bent" across their cross section. If they fail they will just snap & you'll end up with a caliper & remains of a mount in the front wheel, most likely under situation of most stress which is probably when you're hammering it around a fast corner.

Dan :)
 
I'm very surprised that the upside down setup would need any extra bracing...

I'm also worried about your mounts. They are cast so probably quite brittle & will not like being "bent" across their cross section. If they fail they will just snap & you'll end up with a caliper & remains of a mount in the front wheel, most likely under situation of most stress which is probably when you're hammering it around a fast corner.

Dan :)

Or when braking hard and hit a big hole or something.
 
Upside-down forks don't need braces. That is the entire reason behind upside-down forks, is their strength.
 
First off the forkbrace was a prototype and really just for mock-up; Jay already wanted to take the side plates from 1/4" to 1/2" and do some other changes as well. This '05 GSXR1000 fender that came with the project didn't have the metal inner brace. Jay had seen a fork brace like this one a race bike. Will try to find a pic. He isn't exactly an amateur. He's been a mechanic and engine builder for 25+years.

I'll find out all the answers to the questions you guys have when I'm at the shop tomorrow.

I would think however that if the 6mm bolts holding my Tarozzi and Telfix forkbraces on my GS1000's with their flimsy front ends don't ever snap that the 10mm bolts that the caliper and brace share should be fine? Wouldn't you almost need the axle to bend to create enough force to snap that bolt?

David at FastBikeIndustries (#1 service provider for Ohlins) is doing the rebuild on some Ohlins shocks I have for the project. He also rebuilt the rear shock on my GSXR1100. I'll shoot him some pics and get his input. If anyone should know it will be him.
 
I would think however that if the 6mm bolts holding my Tarozzi and Telfix forkbraces on my GS1000's with their flimsy front ends don't ever snap that the 10mm bolts that the caliper and brace share should be fine? Wouldn't you almost need the axle to bend to create enough force to snap that bolt?

You won't have to worry about the brace flexing, breaking, bending, or breaking bolts. The upside-down forks won't flex. That brace is nothing more that a big chunk of useless metal that might run into your frame or fairing when your suspension travels through it's range.
 
You won't have to worry about the brace flexing, breaking, bending, or breaking bolts. The upside-down forks won't flex. That brace is nothing more that a big chunk of useless metal that might run into your frame or fairing when your suspension travels through it's range.

Then why do the gsxr1000 fenders come with metal inner braces? I know when you run without them there is a danger of warping rotors right?
 
Back
Top