I didnt use the brakes at any point. The complication with brakes is you can have 100% maneuverability or 100% braking, but not 100% of both at the same time. Any combination can be had, i.e 10% maneuverability and 90% braking etc. My feeling on the subject is when you need maximum avoidance agility, the one thing you dont want is anything that decreases that ability, consequently, braking is not normally my first response. The downside is if you dont win the bet, and take a hit, it will be at maximum speed and impact.
I think braking, unless done vigorously and early, would have resulted in a low speed crash into the side of the SUV.
Earl
I think braking, unless done vigorously and early, would have resulted in a low speed crash into the side of the SUV.
Earl
I think my 2+ yr riding experience instinct would have been to brake and brake hard. Probably would have meant crashing into the side of the SUV.
Accelerating saved your ass.
Its not exactly instinctive to think about speeding UP in such a situation. Happened to me in my car once...deer coming across the road...could have sped up and swerved opposite to his direction of travel and gotten by but instead jammed on the brakes only to clip him with my passenger side fender.....
My take way from your experience is a reminder to consider ALL options when shiet happens. Swerve, emergency brake, accelerate, alternate path of travel or some combo of them all. I think a newbies 1st reaction is to lock up the brakes. I remember them drilling that into us at MSF....hard braking will only work if you A) have sufficient space to stop, or B) plan on making contact and want to be moving as slowly as possible. Emergency braking with swerving is a good combo...but so would be your move...