• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Master Link Sealant?

Rich82GS750TZ

Forum Guru
Super Site Supporter
Past Site Supporter
Shortly after I bought my bike @ 15 yrs ago, I had someone put on new chain and sprockets. (At least I have no memory of doing it myself) Any-who, there appears to be some kind of gunk on the master link which I can only guess is there to help the link from popping off. Any ideas what this is, and should I use it or something else when I reassemble.

Dy7eN7Al.jpg
 
Last edited:
There is some suggestion that RTV sealant prevents a clip from flyoing off
Dunno how though its pretty weak compard to the force it takes to get one on being springy steel and all.
 
I've used clip master links for decades and never had one fly off.

Overkill for a rare issue
 
Sigh, the great master link debate will now commence.

Use a rivet master link. It is far more secure than a clip link. I?ve seen dozens of failed links, in every case it was a clip. Some installed by professional mechanics.

There will be lots of people who haven?t had a clip link fail, and claim that therefore there?s nothing wrong with them, and blame any failures on improper installation. Bad logic and false facts.

If for some reason you have to use a clip link, the RTV on the clip is a good idea. I?ve seen a clip go missing and the RTV held the side plate on. Not something to rely on, but it gives you a chance.
 
Last edited:
Sigh, the great master link debate will now commence.

Use a rivet master link. It is far more secure than a clip link. I?ve seen dozens of failed links, in every case it was a clip. Some installed by professional mechanics.

There will be lots of people who haven?t had a clip link fail, and claim that therefore there?s nothing wrong with them, and blame any failures on improper installation. Bad logic and false facts.

If for some reason you have to use a clip link, the RTV on the clip is a good idea. I?ve seen a clip go missing and the RTV held the side plate on. Not something to rely on, but it gives you a chance.

Agreed - with everything you said.
Some race sanctioning bodies require either RTV or wiring the clip. I've never done either on a road bike. But if I was prepping for a long trip, I would.
 
Has anyone seen a link fail? I have only once though. I still think RTV would be slightly more useful and slightly less superstitious than lighting a candle.
 
Has anyone seen a link fail?
I certainly have and it took out the crankcases of the first CB750 in my area. My mate was not pleased.
He was even less pleased when it was pointed out to him that cheaping out by joining two or more dog-ends of chain together with master links is not a good idea.
He tried to blame the mechanic who took it out for a road test, for ragging on it too much, but an autopsy showed the real culprit...
 
I certainly have and it took out the crankcases of the first CB750 in my area. My mate was not pleased.
He was even less pleased when it was pointed out to him that cheaping out by joining two or more dog-ends of chain together with master links is not a good idea.
He tried to blame the mechanic who took it out for a road test, for ragging on it too much, but an autopsy showed the real culprit...

Well a patchwork drive chain Ill be damned.
DO they still sell endless drive chains or was that just an oem ploy to get you to buy a priocier chain.

My bike came with one and would have required removing the swingarm so not just a pricier chain some hours of shop time for dealers.

112 link takasago o-ring it was thing of beauty.
 
Has anyone seen a link fail? I have only once though. I still think RTV would be slightly more useful and slightly less superstitious than lighting a candle.
Did you bother to read any posts other than the original? :rolleyes-new:
 
RichD, though you have much more experience then I ever will, I can tell you emphatically that in the ten years I have owned my 550, I have never had the clip fail. I think personal experience should count for something instead of being told how my facts and logic is wrong
 
RichD, though you have much more experience then I ever will, I can tell you emphatically that in the ten years I have owned my 550, I have never had the clip fail. I think personal experience should count for something instead of being told how my facts and logic is wrong
Sorry, but your logic is wrong. :)
You're making the classic mistake of overvaluing direct personal experience, and because of that not correctly assessing risk. Very common, very human thing to do.

So, a beginners guide to risk analysis. :)

There are three main things to consider

1) The probability of a particular failure
2) The probability, given that failure, that we'll have a bad outcome.
3) The cost of mitigating that failure mode.

In our little example here, failure mode is the clip coming off and the chain separating.
The possible bad outcomes range from the bike coasting to a halt on the side of the road, necessitating a trailer ride home, to the chain cracking the crankcase and basically destroying the engine, to you getting rear-ended and dying, because it happened in heavy traffic with a car right on your tail.
The mitigation cost is the extra effort it takes to use a rivet link instead of a clip.

The crucial mistake you're making is assessing the failure probability based only on your own experience. Given that this is a relatively low probability event, that will always cause you to underestimate, because you have zero occurrences.
I have, between racing and spending many hours in a bike service shop, a lot bigger sample to draw on. I've never had a chain fail myself. I know many, many people who have never had one fail. But I also had seen a lot chains that did come apart, and I've seen some bad consequences as a result.

The other thing people get wrong is thinking that any failures of clip link are due to improper installation. That's something that I can't refute with absolute certainty, but consider this: I've had a clip come off (RTV held the side plate on, luckily). I know at least two professional mechanics that have had it happen. So, either it can come off when properly installed, or it's possible for even a pro to get wrong. Statistically it's basically the same.

Finally, we get to mitigation. It cost very little, in either time or money, to use a rivet link instead of a clip.

In the end, we have this.
A low, but not negligibly low, risk of failure. A possibility of serious negative consequences of that failure. And a cheap and easy way of virtually eliminating that risk.

Add all that up and to me, using a rivet link is a no-brainer
 
Sorry, but your logic is wrong. :)
You're making the classic mistake of overvaluing direct personal experience, and because of that not correctly assessing risk. Very common, very human thing to do.

So, a beginners guide to risk analysis. :)

There are three main things to consider

1) The probability of a particular failure
2) The probability, given that failure, that we'll have a bad outcome.
3) The cost of mitigating that failure mode.

In our little example here, failure mode is the clip coming off and the chain separating.
The possible bad outcomes range from the bike coasting to a halt on the side of the road, necessitating a trailer ride home, to the chain cracking the crankcase and basically destroying the engine, to you getting rear-ended and dying, because it happened in heavy traffic with a car right on your tail.
The mitigation cost is the extra effort it takes to use a rivet link instead of a clip.

The crucial mistake you're making is assessing the failure probability based only on your own experience. Given that this is a relatively low probability event, that will always cause you to underestimate, because you have zero occurrences.
I have, between racing and spending many hours in a bike service shop, a lot bigger sample to draw on. I've never had a chain fail myself. I know many, many people who have never had one fail. But I also had seen a lot chains that did come apart, and I've seen some bad consequences as a result.

The other thing people get wrong is thinking that any failures of clip link are due to improper installation. That's something that I can't refute with absolute certainty, but consider this: I've had a clip come off (RTV held the side plate on, luckily). I know at least two professional mechanics that have had it happen. So, either it can come off when properly installed, or it's possible for even a pro to get wrong. Statistically it's basically the same.

Finally, we get to mitigation. It cost very little, in either time or money, to use a rivet link instead of a clip.

In the end, we have this.
A low, but not negligibly low, risk of failure. A possibility of serious negative consequences of that failure. And a cheap and easy way of virtually eliminating that risk.

Add all that up and to me, using a rivet link is a no-brainer

Totally agree.Rivet type links are a no-brainer.Look at all the new bikes even in the 80's (rivets) and sport bikes now.Why roll the dice?
 
Opinions, opinions, everyone's got them. So many different ones. I've done the endless thing, I've done the rivet on thing, & last few have been the clip type. never used sealant or wire for extra security. Decisions, decisions, decide what makes you comfortable & go for it.
 
Might be the alignment of the chain or the power of the bike that pops the clip off, because "theoretically" there's very little load on the clip....

Trundling as I do, never had a problem, though I put some rtv on too when i read about it. were I more aggressive, I would rivet.

A clip comes with the chain. DID seems ok with it ...
 
I've thrown a 630 chain off my first bike, 1980 GS 750. It was flung clear of the bike and engine on the 405 Freeway thru Renton.

Have had at least 6 clips fly off on the 1150 engined bikes in 630 & 530 versions.

One trip coming home over North Cascades (Hwy 20), I made it home, decided to lube the chain when it was freshly warm & found the masterlink clip-sideplate missing.

The master link itself was bent outward on both rollers, sort of holding the chain together- barely.
 
Back
Top