• Required reading for all forum users!!!

    Welcome!
    Register to access the full functionality of the GSResources forum. Until you register and activate your account you will not have full forum access, nor will you be able to post or reply to messages.

    A note to new registrants...
    All new forum registrations must be activated via email before you have full access to the forum.

    A Special Note about Email accounts!
    DO NOT SIGN UP USING hotmail, outlook, gmx, sbcglobal, att, bellsouth or email.com. They delete our forum signup emails.

    A note to old forum members...
    I receive numerous requests from people who can no longer log in because their accounts were deleted. As mentioned in the forum FAQ, user accounts are deleted if you haven't logged in for the past 6 months. If you can't log in, then create a new forum account. If you don't get an error message, then check your email account for an activation message. If you get a message stating that the email address is already in use, then your account still exists so follow the instructions in the forum FAQ for resetting your password.

    Have you forgotten your password or have a new email address? Then read the forum FAQ for details on how to reset it.

    Any email requests for "can't log in anymore" problems or "lost my password" problems will be deleted. Read the forum FAQ and follow the instructions there - that's what we have one for...

  • Returning Visitors

    If you are a returning visitor who never received your confirmation email, then odds are your email provider is blockinig emails from our server. The only thing that can be done to get around this is you will have to try creating another forum account using an email address from another domain.

    If you are a returning visitor to the forum and can't log in using your old forum name and password but used to be able to then chances are your account is deleted. Purges of the databases are done regularly. You will have to create a new forum account and you should be all set.

Low Cost / High Performance GS1100E Head work

67 vette ? :o In a heart beat ;).

Always been the 63 split window that turned me on but I know they don't offer as much performance. Judging by the last Barret Jackson numbers I'm not alone in my lust.
 
Truth be told,

Truth be told,

Always been the 63 split window that turned me on but I know they don't offer as much performance. Judging by the last Barret Jackson numbers I'm not alone in my lust.

I would rather have the 64 or 65 rag top vette :dancing:.
Carburated 365 hp 327 suites me fine.:lol:

Pos
 
67 vette ? :o In a heart beat ;).

I had a 67 vette 427 with tri power. I agree with ya. I have a slightly modified crossfire srt6 that will eat most any muscle car of the era. Amazing what a modern super charged v-6 can do.
 
I had a 67 vette 427 with tri power. I agree with ya. I have a slightly modified crossfire srt6 that will eat most any muscle car of the era. Amazing what a modern super charged v-6 can do.

Some people think they are fast, but they do not even know what fast is.
We are all aware of the new stuff out there and this site is not for the new stuff. We are here for vintage Suzukis.
 
GS1100ED Head update

GS1100ED Head update

Wanted to show some of the results of this thread and teh work Terry at headsbikesmopars did

http://www.thegsresources.com/_forum/member.php?u=2120

I sent a bone stock head 24 bolt head (15K miles on it) to Terry to up the horsepower on my GS1100ED. I was planning on an 1168 cc BB kit and wanted to wring a few more horsehower out of the puppy, but not ruin the driveability for the street. I wanted to put out more than a stock 1150, but not turn my bike into a rip snorting monster.

I could have gone 28.5/24mm v.s. just doing the stock 1150 intake valves; I could have gone Web 0.348" lift v.s. the 0.340's ; I could have degreed the cams for 110/110 instead of 105/107 . If I had i would be measuring out a 6" over swing arm as this baby already easily lift the front wheel in 1st and 2nd gear. And that is with SLOW roll ons and NO 1/4 turn throttle. Of course SLOW is relative as redline comes up pretty quick.

Terry went to town to create a wonderful street head. He pushed the CFM up from stock about 78 CFM to about 95 cfm at my usable lift. He used 28mm 1150 intakes, backcut the valves and ported as shown in the pics. Bill (Chef) thought it was an aggressive port (I don't know), but the bike runs great. Idles very strong, pulls very strong and has lots of low end grunt.

Funny thing is Bill and I run near identical bikes. Main differences are the heads and where the cams are degreed. I think we would run pretty close. Of course he has a few pounds on me. One big difference is he is running 150's and now stepped up to 152.5 on his BS36 CV's. I'm running the same DJ kit but my mains are only 145 same BS36 CV's. Both have 1168, 4:1, Pods, Dyna, 0.340 web cams.

I also attached a plot of the flow results that Terry provided. You can see the before (stock head) and after the porting job. There was well over a 20% increase in flow rate. The step up in the intake valve size can be seen at low lift, while the exhaust showed no impact. As the lift exceeds 0.150 you see the affect of the porting on both sides.

Because of the rush to get to the Julian GSXR trip, there was alot of fiddling to get the carbs right (mostly self inflicted). As it turns out the carbs are very close to where Chef (Bill) set them in the first place and the bike runs great. I still need to readjust the valves , balance the carbs and tweak the idle mixture a little but it runs very nice despite lacking final tweaks. After getting back from Julian (when it was not jetted right), I have made a couple of trips up onto Camino Ceilo. This is basically a narrow mountain road of mostly turns at between 15-30 mphs with speeds seldom exceeding 50 mph. Not someplace you want an unpredictable throttle. The bike is very predictable even though it is a 4000 ft climb from sea level. Idles great, instant response and pulls very strong.

(Camino Ceilo = Sky Road in Spanish)

http://blog.seattlepi.com/velocity/archives/134879.asp

Anyway wanted to let everybody know how well the head turned out and thank Terry for putting in the extra effort to make this a such a great head and how drivable the bike remains. Also thans to Chef for going all out to get my bike ready for the Julian trip. My ED has benefited much from just following his configuration.

Jim

picture.php



picture.php



picture.php



picture.php
 
Last edited:
Here is some more information regarding Terry and his port work. I just got my head back and everything looks great. I would be interested to see a scanned copy of Jim's flow sheet (stock and ported) as it's hard to get an accurate number from your graph.

Here are a few pictures of Terry's work as well as a flow sheet. I still need to clean up the head. Thanks again!

DSC05271.jpg



DSC05272.jpg



DSC05273.jpg



DSC05276.jpg



SCAN0055.jpg
 
What the Busa guys dont understand is that they arent old people friendly, you cant ride the damn things. Im 66 3/4, have a bad back and I dont do water in engines or fuel injection. Outside of that you guys have a good Xmas. I may be old but I still like to go fast !
 
What the Busa guys dont understand is that they arent old people friendly, you cant ride the damn things. Im 66 3/4, have a bad back and I dont do water in engines or fuel injection. Outside of that you guys have a good Xmas. I may be old but I still like to go fast !

Merry Christmas Wooodman, hope your not getting too much snow. My wife just headed up to Kalispel to see her folks at Swan Lake.
 
Here is a comparision of the final numbers between Nicholas's head and mine. Mine has the 28mm 1150 backcut valves Nicholas's has stock 27mm back cut stock valves. Terry did some magic pulling out about 99 CFM at 0.35" lift to improve on the high lift performance of the 27mm valve and across the board improvment for the same valve. He said mine was a mild port :o . Looks like some excellent work you got there Nicholas.


CFM_Summary1.jpg


CFM_Summary2I.jpg


CFM_Summary2E.jpg
 
Last edited:
You can definitely see the improvement of flow down low with the 28mm intakes. In reality our valves are only open up around the .350 range for a fraction of the time that they're open (Jim with .348 webs and me with .355 G4's) so he has more usable flow - a good upgrade with the 28's.



Great work Terry - thanks again!

Jim - what program are you using to make the graphs? Just excel?
Thanks for making the comparison graph. Check your x values with my numbers. He got values at .370 and .4 for me. You have to plot a separate set of X values against my flow numbers.


Thanks,
Nick
 
Last edited:
You can definitely see the improvement of flow down low with the 28mm intakes. In reality our valves are only open up around the .350 range for a fraction of the time that they're open (Jim with .348 webs and me with .355 G4's) so he has more usable flow - a good upgrade with the 28's.



Great work Terry - thanks again!

Jim - what program are you using to make the graphs? Just excel?
Thanks for making the comparison graph. Check your x values with my numbers. He got values at .370 and .4 for me. You have to plot a separate set of X values against my flow numbers.


Thanks,
Nick

Nick,
Just using Excel, I fixed up those couple of data points. I'm using the 0.340's cams not the 0.348's which have much more duration. I also added the stock numbers from my original head. and plotted intakes together and exhaust together. You head seems to have an intake resonance which is boosting the high light CFM. That should work well with a long duration (broad lobe) profile.
Jim
 
I do get what CBXchris is saying modern bikes are cheap horsepower , but were is the fun in that you try to get an old GS750 to go quick talk about money pit.
 
I do get what CBXchris is saying modern bikes are cheap horsepower , but were is the fun in that you try to get an old GS750 to go quick talk about money pit.

I think were mostly talking about old school 1100/1150 muscle :dancing:

Anybody with a stock 1100 has gotta be thinking about it :o
 
My GS project has been static for FAAAAAR too long now.

But I'm getting a little time (and more importantly, spare coin;-) back lately.

Threads like this are giving me teh Major Wood...

IIRC, my DIY port cleanup is roughly 50% complete. Think I'll dig it out and have a look-see this weekend.
Decisions I need to make:
-- Stock or +1 in intake valves? My '83 Kat head has substantial core-shift, lots of undercut at the intake port/valve seat interface. I think +1 would chase it out smooth. But I already have a full set of NOS stock Suzuki valves...
-- Smooth/blend valve guides or not? Don't know how much this influences flow, but valve-stem support is a good thing...

FWIW, my build is similar to some described in this thread:
1166cc, Falicon Supercrank, Web .348 cams, APE springs w/ Ti retainers.
Tractable Street Monster in accordance with Pos' "personality" description.

.
 
Back
Top